Hi,
Is it possible when using (smtp) email to include a CC, or more than 1 reciepient on the to line?
recipients are supported. Are do you mean when sending mail from the terminal server (BBS)? It's technically supported, but I don't think I have a UI mechanism for BBS users to do that.
Re: Emails
By: Digital Man to alterego on Thu Apr 16 2020 09:48 pm
recipients are supported. Are do you mean when sending mail from the terminal server (BBS)? It's technically supported, but I don't think I have a UI mechanism for BBS users to do that.
Yes that latter. (And via the BBS).
I see the CC on incoming mail, but replying I want to CC all basically...
Ah, I see. Shouldn't be too hard. I'll give it some thought.
Re: Emails
By: Digital Man to alterego on Thu Apr 16 2020 09:48 pm
Question
Maybe this error would be easy to reply to:
The message has been saved.
Saved 486 characters (41 lines).
!ERROR writing /home/bbs/sbbs/data/mail
The sysop has been notified.
[Hit a key] +
When I try to send a netmail.
Question
Maybe this error would be easy to reply to:
The message has been saved.
Saved 486 characters (41 lines).
!ERROR writing /home/bbs/sbbs/data/mail
Would seem the bbs doesn't have permission to write to that directory. The directory should be owned by the user:group that sbbs is running as.
Re: Fido
By: Altere to Havok on Fri Apr 17 2020 12:55 pm
Would seem the bbs doesn't have permission to write to that directory. The directory should be owned by the user:group that sbbs is running as.
Hello there...
I have run chown -R bbs:bbs sbbs
Still have the error.
But thank you for the reply!
Re: Emails
By: alterego to Digital Man on Fri Apr 17 2020 03:50 pm
Re: Emails
By: Digital Man to alterego on Thu Apr 16 2020 09:48 pm
recipients are supported. Are do you mean when sending mail from the
terminal server (BBS)? It's technically supported, but I don't think I
have a UI mechanism for BBS users to do that.
Yes that latter. (And via the BBS).
I see the CC on incoming mail, but replying I want to CC all basically...
Ah, I see. Shouldn't be too hard. I'll give it some thought.
Digital wrote:
Re: Emails
By: alterego to Digital Man on Fri Apr 17 2020 03:50 pm
Re: Emails
By: Digital Man to alterego on Thu Apr 16 2020 09:48 pm
recipients are supported. Are do you mean when sending mail from the
terminal server (BBS)? It's technically supported, but I don't think I
have a UI mechanism for BBS users to do that.
Yes that latter. (And via the BBS).
I see the CC on incoming mail, but replying I want to CC all basically...
Ah, I see. Shouldn't be too hard. I'll give it some thought.
I've seen this implemented by other boards where it asks if you want to include a CC. If you do yes then you can enter each address on a new line. You can then just build an array of CC addresses to cycle through.
You could go a step further an request if users wants to CC or BC or just hit enter to continue.
You could go a step further an request if users wants to CC or BC or just hit enter to continue.
Yeah, but I would like to avoid a whole bunch of prompts every time you send an email/netmail message. I'll give it some thought.
Would seem the bbs doesn't have permission to write to that directory. The directory should be owned by the user:group that sbbs is running as.
What user is 'sbbs' running as? What user owns the sbbs/data directory? What user owns the files sbbs/data/mail.*?
Re: Fido
By: Digital Man to Havok on Fri Apr 17 2020 04:31 pm
What user is 'sbbs' running as? What user owns the sbbs/data directory? What user owns the files sbbs/data/mail.*?
bbs:bbs
I'll look over everything today just to make sure all my fido and binkit
settings are right.
Yeah, but I would like to avoid a whole bunch of prompts every time you send email/netmail message. I'll give it some thought.
You could go a step further an request if users wants to CC or BC or just hit enter to continue.
Yeah, but I would like to avoid a whole bunch of prompts every time you send an email/netmail message. I'll give it some thought.
Re: Re: Emails
By: Digital Man to Nelgin on Fri Apr 17 2020 19:00:01
You could go a step further an request if users wants to CC or BC or just hit enter to continue.
Yeah, but I would like to avoid a whole bunch of prompts every time you send an email/netmail message. I'll give it some thought.
most all of the one's i'm familiar with use CC: and/or BCC: lines at the very top of the message body... oyu put them in manually... when the message is saved, the BBS processes it looking for those lines... if it finds them, it sends the message to the addresses listed in them using the proper format... yes, this does mean that multiple messages are generated in the mail base, each with the proper destination address listed...
Well, one of the features of SMB is that you'd have multiple headers
(one for each recipient), but only one copy of the message data (body text).
Would seem the bbs doesn't have permission to write to that
directory. The directory should be owned by the user:group that sbbs
is running as.
I have run chown -R bbs:bbs sbbs
Still have the error.
Assuming your root sbbs directory is /sbbs and all directories and files are owned by user bbs & you're starting sbbs as user bbs & sbbs.ini under [UNIX] User/Group is uncommented and = bbs then maybe it's not. But I would still have to assume it's a permissions error with the information
Assuming your root sbbs directory is /sbbs and all directories and
files are owned by user bbs & you're starting sbbs as user bbs &
sbbs.ini under [UNIX] User/Group is uncommented and = bbs then maybe
it's not. But I would still have to assume it's a permissions error
with the information
That part is fixed now, tanx for the info from your end.
Now if I can get my bind ports to work right, I have my binkit on port 24565 and in linked nodes, Binkp settings ports both are 24554.
Port binding shouldn't be an issue with numbers that high unless something else is around bound to them, you might need to check your all related files to enable it and get it running as a service. Or as DM suggested,
Port binding shouldn't be an issue with numbers that high unless
something else is around bound to them, you might need to check your
all related files to enable it and get it running as a service. Or
as DM suggested,
Service as in a debian service?
http://wiki.synchro.net/module:binkit#service
Again, I'm pretty sure the init-fidonet.js checks all this for you.
Again, I'm pretty sure the init-fidonet.js checks all this for you.
Sysop: | MCMLXXIX |
---|---|
Location: | Prospect, CT |
Users: | 325 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 31:35:37 |
Calls: | 508 |
Messages: | 220012 |