The new sbbsecho is now rejecting messages as "unauthenticated" for areas that exist in my AREAS.BBS file.
What does that mean?
Thanks.
---
þ SLMR 2.1a þ "You've stolen my soul!" - Granpa Simpson
The new sbbsecho is now rejecting messages as "unauthenticated" for areas that exist in my AREAS.BBS file.
What does that mean?
It is also treating good packets as bad:
Packet /sbbs/fido/in/04163003.PKT from 454:1/1 - Incorrect password ('password' instead of '')
Bad packet detected: /sbbs/fido/in/04163003.PKT
[node:454:1/1]
Comment =
PacketPwd =
AreafixPwd = password
Notify = false
Passive = false
Direct = false
Status = normal
Archive = ZIP
Keys =
As you can see, I have no packetpwd set and never have for this node.
Unless I am reading that error message backwards, sbbsecho seems to be attempting to use the areafixpwd as a packet password and is complaining when it does not match.
It means the node which is sending you those messages is not configured in your
echocfg->Linked Nodes.
No. SBBSecho is telling you that the packet contains a password (the word "password") while the node is configured for *no* password.
As you can see, I have no packetpwd set and never have for this node.
Unless I am reading that error message backwards, sbbsecho seems to be
attempting to use the areafixpwd as a packet password and is
complaining when it does not match.
No. SBBSecho is telling you that the packet contains a password (the
word "password") while the node is configured for *no* password.
No. SBBSecho is telling you that the packet contains a password (the word
"password") while the node is configured for *no* password.
It has always been configured for no password. I just checked my old cfg file and my older squish.cfg file... no passwords and, until the upgrade yesterday, no trouble.
It means the node which is sending you those messages is not configured in your
echocfg->Linked Nodes.
Ummm, but this time it is, and the slashes and colons are in the right places:
[node:1:261/38]
Comment =
PacketPwd =
AreafixPwd = password
Notify = false
Passive = false
Direct = false
Status = normal
Archive = ZIP
Keys =
jsexec update.js only converted part of the cfg file, so I had to manually enter several nodes. This might have been one of them, but I do not see a typo this time.
No. SBBSecho is telling you that the packet contains a password (the word "password") while the node is configured for *no* password.
It has always been configured for no password. I just checked my old cfg file and my older squish.cfg file... no passwords and, until the upgrade yesterday, no trouble.
the problem is that in the past sbbsecho ignore pkt password problems so no one
ever knew there was a problem in the first place... as long as the mail moved >they didn't care that it was insecure... now sbbsecho is much more secure and >alerts you to these packet password problems... if they have a password for >your PKTs, you need to have one, too...
So set StrictPacketPaswords = false in your sbbsecho.ini file if you want the >older, less secure, behavior. This is covered here: >http://wiki.synchro.net/util:sbbsecho#changes_in_version_3
Then please post the full log entries related the problem you are having.
jsexec update.js only converted part of the cfg file, so I had to manually >> enter several nodes. This might have been one of them, but I do not see a >> typo this time.
Please send me your sbbsecho.cfg.old file and I'll test the conversion myself and what happens.
Then please post the full log entries related the problem you are having.
As luck would have it :( my log entries only go back to 9/25? The log is massive, so I did a 'tail' on it to confirm this.
Thanks to an email from cron, I do have the output from sbbsecho:
Importing /sbbs/fido/in/31c9ff54.pkt (Type 2e, 5.5KB) from 1:261/38 to 1:2320/10
RBERRYPI: Unauthenticated RBERRYPI EchoMail from 1:261/38 ignored
jsexec update.js only converted part of the cfg file, so I had to manually >> enter several nodes. This might have been one of them, but I do not see a >> typo this time.
Please send me your sbbsecho.cfg.old file and I'll test the conversion myself and what happens.
I shall send both the old file and the new ini, via email, shortly.
To answer a question in advance, there are three USEPACKER ZIP lines in the cfg file because the echocfg program that came with 3.15 would mangle and/or remove nodes if I let a line get too long. Splitting it into multiple lines seemed to prevent this behavior. I thought maybe the conversion did not like the multiple lines, but the nodes I had to add manually did not seem
to follow any pattern as far as what line they came from.
Your sbbs/fido/in directory is your non-secure inbound directory (as I saw from
further up in the log file and in the sbbsecho.ini that you emailed me) and the
packet has no password, so therefore the source cannot be authenticated. You >need remedy one of these security issues (use secure sessions or >password-protected packets, or both).
Sysop: | MCMLXXIX |
---|---|
Location: | Prospect, CT |
Users: | 325 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 04:33:35 |
Calls: | 510 |
Messages: | 220570 |