i setup iv6 on my server via sixxs tunnel, have synchronet support to
bind to ipv6 for telnet and another services?
Re: ipv6
By: Ragnarok to DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion on Tue Mar 31 2015 02:11 am
i setup iv6 on my server via sixxs tunnel, have synchronet support to
bind to ipv6 for telnet and another services?
Not currently. Deuce does have a fork in the works which is planned to be merged into the CVS repos 'sometime soon'.
digital man
On 04-01-15 17:02, Ragnarok wrote to Digital Man <=-
By: Ragnarok to DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion on Tue Mar 31 2015 02:11 am
i setup iv6 on my server via sixxs tunnel, have synchronet support to bind to ipv6 for telnet and another services?
Not currently. Deuce does have a fork in the works which is planned to be merged into the CVS repos 'sometime soon'.
digital man
good! ip4 will be more expensive than gold 'sometime soon' too
--- BILL MCGARRITY wrote --
IPv4 will probably be extinct in a few years... that's why I already made change. Comcast offered it native included in the plan, I jumped on it
On 04-02-15 15:55, mark firestone wrote to BILL MCGARRITY <=-
--- BILL MCGARRITY wrote --
IPv4 will probably be extinct in a few years... that's why I already made change. Comcast offered it native included in the plan, I jumped on it
Where is my flying car and my free fusion power?
--- BILL MCGARRITY wrote --
IPv4 will probably be extinct in a few years... that's why I already made >> change. Comcast offered it native included in the plan, I jumped on it
Where is my flying car and my free fusion power?
--- BILL MCGARRITY wrote --
IPv4 will probably be extinct in a few years... that's why I already made change. Comcast offered it native included in the plan, I jumped on it
Where is my flying car and my free fusion power?
Where is my flying car and my free fusion power?
Re: Re: ipv6
By: mark firestone to BILL MCGARRITY on Thu Apr 02 2015 03:55 pm
--- BILL MCGARRITY wrote --
IPv4 will probably be extinct in a few years... that's why I already
made change. Comcast offered it native included in the plan, I
jumped on it
Where is my flying car and my free fusion power?
they've been saying it's going to be extinct in a few years for many many years.
Yeah, I'd put more stock in it if IPv6 actually worked properly with anything that supposedly supported it. I've lost count of how many times I've had to disable it on clients' routers to stop random disconnects.
Re: Re: ipv6
By: Underminer to Mro on Fri Apr 03 2015 02:52 am
Yeah, I'd put more stock in it if IPv6 actually worked properly with anything that supposedly supported it. I've lost count of how many times I've had to disable it on clients' routers to stop random disconnects.
I've been using it for years and the only times I have problems is when servers
are set up incorrectly.
The problem is most of those incorectly set up servers are on the ISP end.
i hope that syncterm be support it.
bbs.docksud.com.ar from the world . I now research how to formward the 23 ipv6 to the ipv4 port until synchronet support ipv6 natively
Re: Re: ipv6
By: Ragnarok to Deuce on Sun Apr 05 2015 01:30 am
i hope that syncterm be support it.
SyncTERM has supported IPv6 for a few years now.
bbs.docksud.com.ar from the world . I now research how to formward the 23 ipv6 to the ipv4 port until synchronet support ipv6 natively
Expect IPv6 native support very soon after the next official release.
Re: Re: ipv6
By: Underminer to Deuce on Sat Apr 04 2015 06:28 pm
The problem is most of those incorectly set up servers are on the ISP
end.
I dunno, my IPv6 ISP is Hurricane Electric. It's not a problem with the protocol itself though.
--- UNDERMINER wrote --
Yeah, I'd put more stock in it if IPv6 actually worked properly with anyth that supposedly supported it. I've lost count of how many times I've had t disable it on clients' routers to stop random disconnects
less--- UNDERMINER wrote --
Yeah, I'd put more stock in it if IPv6 actually worked properly with
anyth that supposedly supported it. I've lost count of how many times
I've had t disable it on clients' routers to stop random disconnects
Yep. I've got it disabled on all the servers I manage where I work, to prevent weird domain communication failures and other strange issues.
IPv6 is kind of dumb. Well, it was really smart, ten plus years ago, in solving a bunch of problems that have since been solved a different,
smart way, since. Because those problems have been kludged over, IPv6will
break things... and because it's not really interoperable with IPv4,it's
virtually impossible to implement. It's like a country that drives onthe
left deciding it's going to drive on the right next Monday.
But we need it. ):
---
* TARDIS BBS - Home of QUARKware * telnet bbs.cortex-media.info 4223
The sad thing is, the DoD is still pushing to have their networks 100% IPV6 even though that's not really necessary.
Nonya - Pimptastic BBS
On 04-09-15 13:09, mark firestone wrote to UNDERMINER <=-
--- UNDERMINER wrote --
Yeah, I'd put more stock in it if IPv6 actually worked properly with anyth that supposedly supported it. I've lost count of how many times I've had t disable it on clients' routers to stop random disconnects
Yep. I've got it disabled on all the servers I manage where I work, to prevent weird domain communication failures and other strange issues.
IPv6 is kind of dumb. Well, it was really smart, ten plus years ago,
in solving a bunch of problems that have since been solved a different, less smart way, since. Because those problems have been kludged over, IPv6 will break things... and because it's not really interoperable
with IPv4, it's virtually impossible to implement. It's like a country that drives on the left deciding it's going to drive on the right next Monday.
But we need it. ):
| Sysop: | MCMLXXIX |
|---|---|
| Location: | Prospect, CT |
| Users: | 325 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 03:13:58 |
| Calls: | 510 |
| Messages: | 220569 |