Hi DM,
I found this tonight - It looks like someone put a copy of Synchronet on GitHub a couple years ago:
https://github.com/protomouse/synchronet
Have you seen that?
I found this tonight - It looks like someone put a copy of Synchronet
on GitHub a couple years ago:
https://github.com/protomouse/synchronet
Have you seen that?
I don't recall. I may have. Others have professed how they used git or wanted to use git for Synchronet. <shrug>
I don't recall. I may have. Others have professed how they used git or wanted to use git for Synchronet. <shrug>
through those who track you down personally, nor only via obscure 'internet dark alleys', but CVS only is going to be seen that way before too terribly
I don't recall. I may have. Others have professed how they used git
or wanted to use git for Synchronet. <shrug>
I've got to say, I've been wondering this for awhile, as well.
Synchronet isn't suffering from the issue yet of being available only through those who track you down personally, nor only via obscure 'internet dark alleys', but CVS only is going to be seen that way before too terribly long. DOVE-Net may keep that at bay for quite awhile, but you never know... I'd just hate to see the Synchronet software end up going to the way of so much shareware from decades prior, only to be found on 5.25in floppies with handwritten labels and the like...
Hi DM,
I found this tonight - It looks like someone put a copy of Synchronet on GitHub
a couple years ago:
https://github.com/protomouse/synchronet
Have you seen that?
Nightfox
---
� Synchronet � Digital Distortion BBS - digitaldistortionbbs.com
I still don't think CVS is good as a software distribution tool, since CVS i designed mainly as a file versioning archival tool, which is most useful for developers. Although the code in the CVS is fairly stable, it's still considered 'in development'. Also, someone who just wants to get the offici release and install it isn't going to want to check out files from a version system and compile it themselves. Software just isn't normally distributed users via a versioning system. The official Synchronet releases are posted the Synchronet web site, www.synchro.net. It's not that hard to find by doi a web search, so it's not lost in some obscure "internet dark alley".
Yeah, I love git and github. I haven't really touched CVS or SVN for so
many years now. But, as with any project, you get to use what *you* want :)
Anyhow, if the devs are comfortable with CVS they should stick with that if they want.Also, maybe there's a way to have it both ways possibly by tring to echo the CVS I would assume using cvs and git commands in a script to synch them up if not at the exact same time at a scheduled interval. You wouldn't exactly be getting the best of both worlds there, because one of the benefits of github would be enabling user <-> developer communication, but perhaps it can evolve into a knowledge base and point of reference
(what I see as the primary advantage of github over CVS). Also, as people have said the distribution system might be more straightforward.
I still don't think CVS is good as a software distribution tool, since CVS is designed mainly as a file versioning archival tool, which is most useful for developers. Although the code in the CVS is fairly stable, it's still considered 'in development'. Also, someone who just wants to get the official release and install it isn't going to want to check out files from a versioning system and compile it themselves. Software just isn't
normally distributed to users via a versioning system. The official Synchronet releases are posted to the Synchronet web site, www.synchro.net. It's not that hard to find by doing a web search, so it's not lost in some obscure "internet dark alley".
Nightfox
Sysop: | MCMLXXIX |
---|---|
Location: | Prospect, CT |
Users: | 325 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 11:47:53 |
Calls: | 510 |
Messages: | 220575 |