But in the days of King David, it was part of Israel. In Jesus' day, it was part of the Hasmonean Kingdom that ended with Herod the Great. In 1967, Gaza again became part of Israel when Egypt lost it in the Six Day's War.
under the title, "Gaza First." Sharon intended to turn Gaza completely over Palestinian rule, hoping to accomplish two goals in the process.
Within a year, the residents of Gaza elected Hamas on their foundational platform that calls for the destruction of Israel and its replacement with a Islamic state.
A year after that, finds the Halavi Report, "The declared policy of Hamas to provide sanctuary to any jihad fighter invites additional terrorist groups associated with al-Qaida to plant themselves in the Gaza Strip."
Here's the amazing part. I believe that this is exactly what Ariel Sharon expected to happen. His only miscalculation was in thinking that, having see a preview of what a Palestinian state would look like, the world would come its collective senses.
Sharon underestimated two things: the almost palpable fear among Western governments to do anything that might offend Islam, and the depth of nascent global anti-Semitism. The world fears Islam, but it despises Israel on a lev so deep that it is defies logical explanation.
Seen at that level, if Islam destroyed Israel and then went back into hibernation, it would be a fair trade. Maybe it would, maybe it wouldn't, bu for some, especially at the U.N., it's worth the risk. All they have to lose is Israel.
It is almost impossible to fathom, but, barring that explanation, how does o account for the fact the world is still clamoring for the creation of a Palestinian state?
In every possible area of measurement, the Palestinians have failed the test for statehood.
Even blindness can't account for such widespread ignorance of the danger. It goes beyond "blindness," skids right past "ignorance," and stops squarely in front of "delusional."
Why would the world side with an openly terrorist entity – in the midst of a war on terror – at the expense of the only reliable Western allied democracy in the region, leaving it adrift in a sea of rapacious Islamic dictatorships
Try, for a moment, to substitute some other Western representative democracy instead of Israel into this scenario in your imagination.
Israel is an ally to every nation fighting the war on Islamic terror. Those same allied nations are advancing a policy of granting statehood to terroris sworn to the destruction of that ally ... never mind. The more I try to explain it, the crazier it sounds. And that's the point.
This is exactly the scenario outlined by the Hebrew prophets as signs of the soon coming of Israel's Messiah.
The prophet Zechariah predicted the whole world would be united against Isra over the Jerusalem Question (Zechariah 12:1-3); the prophet Daniel (Daniel 9:27) predicted an agreement that seemingly settles the Temple Mount Questio and the prophet Ezekiel predicts that, in the end, Israel will still face a massive Islamic invasion reluctantly overseen by Russia and led by Persia (Iran) (Ezekiel 38:5).
Think about this for a second. Since it is absolutely illogical, and yet it also exactly the situation we find ourselves witnessing, do you really belie it was all just a really good guess?
It would be amazing enough if the prophets had forecast a scenario that made sense and it came to pass. But the scenario they predicted defies all natura explanation – and yet is coming to pass as literally as it was forecast.
The fact is the Bible is true, and the setup for the fulfillment of Bible prophecies for the final seven years of Tribulation are almost complete. The is only a short time left to choose where you will spend eternity.
Jesus Christ purchased a pardon on your behalf with His own blood at Calvary Cross. He extends it to you now. All you need do is accept it. Allow Jesus Christ to come into your life and He will transform it forever.
The choice is yours.
Relate
Re: Interestingly Enough..By: Top Gun to All on Fri Oct 05 2007 11:42:00
But in the days of King David, it was part of Israel. In Jesus' day, it was part of the Hasmonean Kingdom that ended with Herod the Great. In 1967, Gaza again became part of Israel when Egypt lost it in the Six Day's War.
[digressive sidenote]
Funny you mention the Six Days War. The Israeli government, even today, denies knowing that the USS Liberty was an American vessel at the time they were busy sinking it from the air.
check out http://www.ussliberty.org/findings.htm. Compare that with
what navy.mil has to say about "mistaken Identity."
[/digressive sidenote]
under the title, "Gaza First." Sharon intended to turn Gaza completely over Palestinian rule, hoping to accomplish two goals in the process.
. . .
Within a year, the residents of Gaza elected Hamas on their foundational platform that calls for the destruction of Israel and its replacement with a Islamic state.
Well, considering that the Palestinians were replaced with an Islamic state, it's more a case of turnabout, isn't it?
A year after that, finds the Halavi Report, "The declared policy of Hamas to provide sanctuary to any jihad fighter invites additional terrorist groups associated with al-Qaida to plant themselves in the Gaza Strip."
Here's the amazing part. I believe that this is exactly what Ariel Sharon expected to happen. His only miscalculation was in thinking that, having see a preview of what a Palestinian state would look like, the world would come its collective senses.
Okay. Here's where your post gets interesting.
Sharon underestimated two things: the almost palpable fear among Western governments to do anything that might offend Islam, and the depth of nascent global anti-Semitism. The world fears Islam, but it despises Israel on a lev so deep that it is defies logical explanation.
Fear of offending Islam? What demonstrates this fear? Swagger towards Pakistan? Open threats of war against Iran? The atrocities of Abu Ghraib, Guant…namo Bay, Camp Buucca, and others?
And it's not so much anti-Semitism as it is anti-Israelism. Remeber that Israel was *given* a country, by force of UN might. And now is being used as a stepping stone to control in the Middle East.
Seen at that level, if Islam destroyed Israel and then went back into hibernation, it would be a fair trade. Maybe it would, maybe it wouldn't, bu for some, especially at the U.N., it's worth the risk. All they have to lose is Israel.
Suuuuuure.
It is almost impossible to fathom, but, barring that explanation, how does o account for the fact the world is still clamoring for the creation of a Palestinian state?
As a way to say "sorry we stole your country. here's some of it back. Our bad."
In every possible area of measurement, the Palestinians have failed the test for statehood.
. . .
Even blindness can't account for such widespread ignorance of the danger. It goes beyond "blindness," skids right past "ignorance," and stops squarely in front of "delusional."
Wow. That was a scathing review of Palestinians.
Why would the world side with an openly terrorist entity – in the midst of a war on terror – at the expense of the only reliable Western allied democracy in the region, leaving it adrift in a sea of rapacious Islamic dictatorships
Try, for a moment, to substitute some other Western representative democracy instead of Israel into this scenario in your imagination.
Oh, I can easily think of a couple that are also arrogant, expansionist meddlers.
Israel is an ally to every nation fighting the war on Islamic terror. Those same allied nations are advancing a policy of granting statehood to terroris sworn to the destruction of that ally ... never mind. The more I try to explain it, the crazier it sounds. And that's the point.
Israel is just as much a theocratic entity as Palestine. Israel was given as a *Jewish* homeland, and flies a Star of David for a national flag. They are, indeed, fighting *Islam,* and labeling it with the current buzzword of "terrorist."
This is exactly the scenario outlined by the Hebrew prophets as signs of the soon coming of Israel's Messiah.
And now, finally, comes this thread's relevance to Religion, as opposed to political debate.
The prophet Zechariah predicted the whole world would be united against Isra over the Jerusalem Question (Zechariah 12:1-3); the prophet Daniel (Daniel 9:27) predicted an agreement that seemingly settles the Temple Mount Questio and the prophet Ezekiel predicts that, in the end, Israel will still face a massive Islamic invasion reluctantly overseen by Russia and led by Persia (Iran) (Ezekiel 38:5).
Zechariah 12:2 - "Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of trembling unto all the people round about, when they shall be in the siege both against Judah *and* against Jerusalem.
Daniel 9:27 - "He will confirm a covenant with many for one week. In the middle of the week he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And on a wing of the temple he will set up an abomination that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him."
Ezekiel 38:5 - "Persia, Cush and Put will be with them, all with shields and helmets,"
Okay, so you found three that might relate to this time. The funny thing about prophecy is that if stay vague enough, *every* prediction will come true, eventually.
And where is Persia? Where is Cush? Where is Put? I know, you'll tell me that they've changed names and borders since biblical times, but that argument is an example of bibliolatrous suspension of logic.
After all, everything in the Bible is the Word of God, right? Well, then, if God says "Persia, Cush, and Put," then isn't it your *duty* as a follower of the *truth,* to look out for mah'fahn CUSH? Shouldn't you be preparing to put Put in it's place?
And Daniel's prophecy, by the way, was written after the fact, around 165 bce, but "prophesized" events that occured around 600 bce.
Ezekial wasn't referring to now. He was referring to Tyre - which still stands, by the way!
Think about this for a second. Since it is absolutely illogical, and yet it also exactly the situation we find ourselves witnessing, do you really belie it was all just a really good guess?
No. It was history written in a prophetic voice, to point out moralist lessons to Hebrews.
Since when are the books of the prophets in the OT anything more than various *commentaries* on the Torah? Which, by the way, has its own brand of silliness I'd love to discuss some time.
It would be amazing enough if the prophets had forecast a scenario that made sense and it came to pass. But the scenario they predicted defies all natura explanation – and yet is coming to pass as literally as it was forecast.
No it's not. Once again, the armies of Cush ore not beseiging Jerusalem. Jerusalem is safely ensconced in Israel, surrounded by a solid military structure. Tyre still stands.
The fact is the Bible is true, and the setup for the fulfillment of Bible prophecies for the final seven years of Tribulation are almost complete. The is only a short time left to choose where you will spend eternity.
The bible is true? Okay, then, let's go buy some slaves! After all, God himself told us, in his infalliable bible, how to ethically hold, buy, and use slaves... <Genesis 17:12; Exodus 12:43;, Exodus 21:1; Leviticus 25:44; Colossians 3:22> God loves slavery! Let's look at some of God's other divine zingers while we're at it..
Have you given all of your wealth away yet? If not, send me an email "musical.moose.studios@gmail.com" and I'll gladly tell you where to deposit it. <Matthew 6:19, 6:24, 19:21-24; Luke 14:33, 9:23-25>
Have you ceased striving for personal success yet? Stop trying to better yourself <Hebrews 13:5, Phillippians 2:3, Acts 2:44-45>
Jesus Christ purchased a pardon on your behalf with His own blood at Calvary Cross. He extends it to you now. All you need do is accept it. Allow Jesus Christ to come into your life and He will transform it forever.
This is false as well, by biblical standards. Acceptance isn't enough. You must also cast aside all worldly possesions, desire for self improvement, and literally follow the Torah. You must be willing to allow slavery, murder, genocide when God commands it of you, but still not kill (unless ordered to).
Not to mention you must suspend all logic and blindly ignore the many blatant contradictions of fundemental movements, especially evangelical Christianity in the west.
The choice is yours.
Relate
Yep. And I choose to follow logic and reason. The Judeo-Christian God is *imaginary.*
Surreality is just an illusion.þ Synchronet þ [aceshigh.dyn.dhs.org] - Come fly our friendly skies!
---
you not likit Budda ?
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.By: chinaman to Dali's Llama on Sun Oct 07 2007 11:48 am
þ Synchronet þ Warzone BBS - so exclusive only I can callyou not likit Budda ?
You fucking fool, you just quoted a 250 line book for a irrelevent 1 line reply..
go to hell fuckface!
--
Mrproper (Tim Smith)
mrproper38 {at} gmail {dot} com
---
Hey stupid, not no what uyou talk about, I not quote anything you asshole o faggot. you to old, why not retire from life and droppit dead. You shood get cremate casue you not wirth coffin and plot. Not even pet cemetry.
And who you callit fuckface, you one with old rinkle face you old aarp MF. Y just nudder MAMBLa memeba hair that all. You nudder asshole like udders hair Also just to warn you , I savit that enail you send me and threathen to kill me.
what makes you think you know my age? Fool!
what makes you think you know my age? Fool!
According to my 4 year old... 30's been old since forever.
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: chinaman to Dali's Llama on Sun Oct 07 2007 11:48 am
you not likit Budda ?
You fucking fool, you just quoted a 250 line book for a irrelevent 1 line reply..
I can't believe that one sysop in the sysop channel said this is better
than FidoNet. If fidonet is worse then God help us all.
respectful discussions, I have to wonder if the quality of DoveNet has went downhill.
Please reflect on how you are talking to one another and what you are saying... meditate for a moment and ask... is it kind, is it true and is it necessary. If you have to guess on one of those then don't post it.
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: Oracle to Mrproper on Sat Nov 10 2007 09:35 pm
I can't believe that one sysop in the sysop channel said this is better than FidoNet. If fidonet is worse then God help us all.
It is. Honest.
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: Oracle to Mrproper on Sat Nov 10 2007 09:35 pm
I can't believe that one sysop in the sysop channel said this is better than FidoNet. If fidonet is worse then God help us all.
It is. Honest.
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: Deuce to Oracle on Sat Nov 10 2007 09:08 pm
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: Oracle to Mrproper on Sat Nov 10 2007 09:35 pm
I can't believe that one sysop in the sysop channel said this is bette than FidoNet. If fidonet is worse then God help us all.
It is. Honest.
Fidonet blows.
Dirty Jack Rackham...A.K.A: Ralph Smole
www.bullishmcgee.com
www.ralphsmole.com
nimbus.synchro.net
You fucking fool, you just quoted a 250 line book for a irrelevent 1 line reply..
You know, I felt good about carrying Dovenet when I was reading the older messages in this sub. However as I get to the more recent and see messages like this in a religious area, where people ONCE had reasonable and respectful discussions, I have to wonder if the quality of DoveNet has went downhill.
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: Oracle to Mrproper on Sat Nov 10 2007 09:35 pm
Addendum:
I look at words differently that others.. example with your whining an ignorance your acting like a nigger.
I know you just got pissed for me calling you that and I can just about gues you want to reply calling me a racist.
A nigger can be in ANY ethnic group, a nigger is a lazy ignorant person, so can go on continuing to be a nigger or you can post some relevant topics in dovenet and show us that you are'nt a nigger.
--
Mrproper (Tim Smith)
mrproper38 {at} gmail {dot} com
A nigger can be in ANY ethnic group, a nigger is a lazy ignorant person, so can go on continuing to be a nigger or you can post some relevant topics in dovenet and show us that you are'nt a nigger.
so, what do we callthe people from nigeria?
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: Corey to Mrproper on Sun Nov 11 2007 10:08 pm
so, what do we callthe people from nigeria?
Nigerians.
Dirty Jack Rackham...A.K.A: Ralph Smole
www.bullishmcgee.com
www.ralphsmole.com
nimbus.synchro.net
what is wrong with the word ____.. after all it was invented by christians, when a male or female commited adulty they were put in the stockades for everyone to see.. guess what acronym was written on the stockades for the adulteres?
and if someone plays the part of a fool I have the right to call them that.
Words are just words.. God did'nt write a book of "Bad words" that we cannot say.
You should be getting on to the person I "Cursed" for using your precious religious debate sub as a medium to start trouble, Not to the person tryiing run that person out of your holy sub.
I look at words differently that others.. example with your whining an
You know, people have been using the excuse that the word "n-----" is define as a lazy,ignorant person. Answer this: how many times have you heard the wo used in reference to a non-black individual??
F.U.C.K
For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge
and if someone plays the part of a fool I have the right to call them that.
A nigger can be in ANY ethnic group, a nigger is a lazy ignorant person, can go on continuing to be a nigger or you can post some relevant topics dovenet and show us that you are'nt a nigger.
so, what do we callthe people from nigeria?
so, what do we callthe people from nigeria?
Nigerians.
ah
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.By: Mrproper to Oracle on Mon Nov 12 2007 12:17 am
A nigger can be in ANY ethnic group, a nigger is a lazy ignorant person, so can go on continuing to be a nigger or you can post some relevant topics in dovenet and show us that you are'nt a nigger.
You know, people have been using the excuse that the word "nigger" is defined as a lazy,ignorant person. Answer this: how many times have you heard the word used in reference to a non-black individual?? So spare me your bullshit and just shut the fuck up. Go back to smoking weed until your last brain cell disintegrates.
Dirty Jack Rackham...A.K.A: Ralph Smole
www.bullishmcgee.com
www.ralphsmole.com
nimbus.synchro.net
---þ Synchronet þ The Nimbus BBS: nimbus.synchro.net AND
wow, he smokit pot to? no wunder so many hare virent nasty peeple!
Ralph, I respect you and your opinions... this is a good debate topic, can w please move it to the debate area and try to get Religion back on Religion?
Oracle
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: Oracle to Ralph Smole on Mon Nov 12 2007 11:15:00
Ralph, I respect you and your opinions... this is a good debate topic, ca please move it to the debate area and try to get Religion back on Religio
Oracle
God forbid there be ANY debate about religion hahahahahaha...
TheTaz...
so, what do we callthe people from nigeria?
You know, people have been using the excuse that the word "nigger" is define as a lazy,ignorant person. Answer this: how many times have you heard the wo used in reference to a non-black individual?? So spare me your bullshit and just shut the fuck up. Go back to smoking weed until your last brain cell disintegrates.
I look at words differently that others.. example with your whining an
Then again, the board is Religion... what does this have to do with Religion It can be said that ignorant people can't keep to topic as well? Not that I calling you ignorant... but can we at least return to the root topic.
I for one take the proper definition as the most common one. And you are absolutely right.. the most common definition -is- seldom used on a non-blac individual. You also have to look at the history of the dictionary... the first definition of the "N" word was written in a time when there was segregation and opression against blacks... the definition was more of a "convienience to the times" than the actual definion.
Ralph, I respect you and your opinions... this is a good debate topic, can w please move it to the debate area and try to get Religion back on Religion?
good day smole.
With regards to the social ramifications;Mrproper wrote to Ralph Smole <=-
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: Ralph Smole to Mrproper on Mon Nov 12 2007 05:35 am
You know, people have been using the excuse that the word "nigger" is define as a lazy,ignorant person. Answer this: how many times have you heard the wo used in reference to a non-black individual?? So spare me your bullshit and just shut the fuck up. Go back to smoking weed until your last brain cell disintegrates.
#1, you're an ignorant asshole
#2, I was stressing the poing that when people like micheal richards
says the word nigger he has to kiss al sharptons ass to try to get an apology, who made sharpaton the hnic.
#3, I have heard the heard the word nigger used to define someone other the someone of the black race a good bit.
#4, If you get angry hearing the word nigger and you are a white person then you are a racist because you believe nigger means "some black
person"
good day smole.
Hello twitlist!
Where is it you find WHITE people upset (as if they had been singled
out) by saying N*gger?
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.By: The Chinaman to Ralph Smole on Tue Nov 13 2007 01:19 am
wow, he smokit pot to? no wunder so many hare virent nasty peeple!
Shut up Ron.. Go back to your hole.
/yawn
/getting old Ron
Jason - W8ZZUþ Synchronet þ Scanner Enthusiasts BBS - scannerbbs.dyndns.org - *Dove-Net
Total Logged Contacts = 1389
Last Contact: WA8YUZ on 10M SSB. Location: Michigan. 10/28/07 at 19:23 UTC
---
With regards to the social ramifications;Mrproper wrote to Finnigann <=-
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: Finnigann to Mrproper on Tue Nov 13 2007 12:39 pm
Where is it you find WHITE people upset (as if they had been singled
out) by saying N*gger?
It's all over the news these days.. and at times I use the word nigger
and it pisses people I know off.. just as you just censored the word nigger, WHY are you using that word in a derrogatory nature against anyone? Why must you censor yourself.
Black comedians use the word nigger what gives them the right to do
that? because by doing that they are using in in a slanderious nature, They also call whites crackers, who gives them the right to do that.
When Micheal Richards was heckled at when doing his stand up comedy he called the group of people niggers, how did he know that group of
people could have been white people, hispanics, arabs or whatever..
But to sum it up, yes I've had a few white folks get pissed at me for using the word nigger, My black friends don't get mad for me using that word because they know I'm not using it in that context. I'm not a racially motivated person, I look at one human being just the same as
the next, I will not judge anyone by their religion either, sometimes I might have a good debate with them but I'm not judgmental to them.
Hope that covers my views on the word NIGGER and why it should'nt be censored.
and I still would like to know why all these white movie stars who say nigger are tarred an feathered on the media and then have to go kiss
jesse jackson or al sharptons ass for an apology, while at the same
time black and hispanic or other ethnic stars can say nigger, spic, cracker, camel jocky, or whatever else without the least little buzz on the media.
Mrproper wrote to Finnigann <=-
When Micheal Richards was heckled at when doing his stand up comedy he called the group of people niggers, how did he know that group of
people could have been white people, hispanics, arabs or whatever..
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: Ralph Smole to Mrproper on Tue Nov 13 2007 04:43 pm
good day smole.
Hello twitlist!
Since you can't see this anyway.. suck an egg...
it would'nt amaze me if you would'nt try to twitlist Jesus Christ because yo don't like what he states in his prophecies.
--
Mrproper (Tim Smith)
mrproper38 {at} gmail {dot} com
One other request... can we please move this to debate...it's
off topic for religion.
it would'nt amaze me if you would'nt try to twitlist Jesus Christ because don't like what he states in his prophecies.Nah. I admire Jesus Christ.
I thought I was in your twitlist.. how can you read my messages if I'm in yo twitlist??
With regards to the social ramifications;Ralph Smole wrote to Mrproper <=-
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: Mrproper to Ralph Smole on Wed Nov 14 2007 07:52 pm
I thought I was in your twitlist.. how can you read my messages if I'm in yo twitlist??
I counted to ten and decided against it. I was just as much to blame
for the outbursts in that particular thread. So, I twitted myself :-)
Should you be making such disclosures in an open forum?
With regards to the social ramifications;Mrproper wrote to Finnigann <=-
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: Finnigann to Mrproper on Tue Nov 13 2007 12:39 pm
Where is it you find WHITE people upset (as if they had been singled
out) by saying N*gger?
It's all over the news these days.. and at times I use the word nigger and it pisses people I know off.. just as you just censored the word nigger, WHY are you using that word in a derrogatory nature against anyone? Why must you censor yourself.
Because I personally hate that word. I hate what it means to nearly
everyone else. It's a word that means 'second class'.
You may try to alter it's meaning (as did another poster with the words
'gay' and 'fagot') But they are words that convey hate.
Black comedians use the word nigger what gives them the right to do that? because by doing that they are using in in a slanderious nature, They also call whites crackers, who gives them the right to do that.
Not all do, and many wont. If they want to, it doesn't change my usage.
Nothing comes to mind as a 'white' slang. Perhaps 'craker'? Doesn't
convey hate to me and is a poor simile...
When Micheal Richards was heckled at when doing his stand up comedy he called the group of people niggers, how did he know that group of people could have been white people, hispanics, arabs or whatever..
I didn't see/hear that. But does anyone think he meant anyone other
than black people?
But to sum it up, yes I've had a few white folks get pissed at me for using the word nigger, My black friends don't get mad for me using that word because they know I'm not using it in that context. I'm not a racially motivated person, I look at one human being just the same as the next, I will not judge anyone by their religion either, sometimes I might have a good debate with them but I'm not judgmental to them.
If you really respect your black friends, you'd find another word to
use. I seriously doubt they understand your views as being totally
benign.
The word stings.
Hope that covers my views on the word NIGGER and why it should'nt be censored.
A lot of people try to say, "... but NOT me!" It's not entirely YOUR
perception that is the deciding factor.
What's that old sig block...
I know you think you understand what I said.
But what you don't understand,
what I said, wasn't what I meant.
and I still would like to know why all these white movie stars who say nigger are tarred an feathered on the media and then have to go kiss jesse jackson or al sharptons ass for an apology, while at the same time black and hispanic or other ethnic stars can say nigger, spic, cracker, camel jocky, or whatever else without the least little buzz on the media.
You might, someday.
Did you ever see/read the work, 'Black Like Me'?
A journalist takes some medication that causes his skin to darken. In
the movie, he looks black.
He tells of his life afterwards. Things changed for him, just because
of his skin color. Same man. Different reactions. Of course the blacks
that he met treated him differently also. It works two ways. No one is
exempt. It may not be an issue in a homogenous enviroment, but it's
there nontheless, just below the surface.
Perhaps it has survival benefits. Beware of anyone not of our clan.
Different is dangerous. But we don't live in tiny groups any more.
Attitudes can change. I hope so anyway.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
/ \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \
( F | i | n | n | i | g | a | n | n )
\_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/
... "42? 7 and a half million years and all you can come up with is 42?!" --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.47
þ Synchronet þ Bits-N-Bytes - bnb.dtdns.net / bnb.synchro.net
I am from Ohio
Hey all,
I do not like that word at all either.. I would have to agree that it conveys a lot of hate, however, I don't believe in censorship either.
It is really a good thing that people can say those words. It gives us
an opportunity to see how we have grown as a society, and how far we
are moving to bridge the gap between black and white cultures. So far, most people really dislike that word, however we do know that some out there still have the tendency to make race a divider between them. Not just whites, but blacks as well. If censorship was in place, how would
we know where the problem spots were?? Sometimes it's nice to have the opportunity to be offended every now and again, it gives us a place to focus our efforts to promote change. Besides, when it is all done and
over with, the real judge of us all is God and him alone.
Slink
With regards to the social ramifications;Mrproper wrote to Finnigann <=-
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: Finnigann to Mrproper on Tue Nov 13 2007 12:39 pm
Where is it you find WHITE people upset (as if they had been singled
out) by saying N*gger?
It's all over the news these days.. and at times I use the word nigger and it pisses people I know off.. just as you just censored the word nigger, WHY are you using that word in a derrogatory nature against anyone? Why must you censor yourself.
Because I personally hate that word. I hate what it means to nearly
everyone else. It's a word that means 'second class'.
You may try to alter it's meaning (as did another poster with the words
'gay' and 'fagot') But they are words that convey hate.
Black comedians use the word nigger what gives them the right to do that? because by doing that they are using in in a slanderious nature, They also call whites crackers, who gives them the right to do that.
Not all do, and many wont. If they want to, it doesn't change my usage.
Nothing comes to mind as a 'white' slang. Perhaps 'craker'? Doesn't
convey hate to me and is a poor simile...
When Micheal Richards was heckled at when doing his stand up comedy he called the group of people niggers, how did he know that group of people could have been white people, hispanics, arabs or whatever..
I didn't see/hear that. But does anyone think he meant anyone other
than black people?
But to sum it up, yes I've had a few white folks get pissed at me for using the word nigger, My black friends don't get mad for me using that word because they know I'm not using it in that context. I'm not a racially motivated person, I look at one human being just the same as the next, I will not judge anyone by their religion either, sometimes I might have a good debate with them but I'm not judgmental to them.
If you really respect your black friends, you'd find another word to
use. I seriously doubt they understand your views as being totally
benign.
The word stings.
Hope that covers my views on the word NIGGER and why it should'nt be censored.
A lot of people try to say, "... but NOT me!" It's not entirely YOUR
perception that is the deciding factor.
What's that old sig block...
I know you think you understand what I said.
But what you don't understand,
what I said, wasn't what I meant.
and I still would like to know why all these white movie stars who say nigger are tarred an feathered on the media and then have to go kiss jesse jackson or al sharptons ass for an apology, while at the same time black and hispanic or other ethnic stars can say nigger, spic, cracker, camel jocky, or whatever else without the least little buzz on the media.
You might, someday.
Did you ever see/read the work, 'Black Like Me'?
A journalist takes some medication that causes his skin to darken. In
the movie, he looks black.
He tells of his life afterwards. Things changed for him, just because
of his skin color. Same man. Different reactions. Of course the blacks
that he met treated him differently also. It works two ways. No one is
exempt. It may not be an issue in a homogenous enviroment, but it's
there nontheless, just below the surface.
Perhaps it has survival benefits. Beware of anyone not of our clan.
Different is dangerous. But we don't live in tiny groups any more.
Attitudes can change. I hope so anyway.
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: Slink to Finnigann on Mon Jan 28 2008 12:14 am
I am from Ohio, and it happened to me.
A 5th grader here had never heard the N word and had absolutely no idea
of racism or hating different colored folk or other countries.
There was alot of them around like that just here in the neighborhood and city. It's starting to 'clear up' lol was my first impression.
2 generations later or so at least, jeez.
This leads me to believe it's all our parents/family/how we grew up
who might have hammered that shit into our minds. Think back to being a
kid and your parents or grandparents or whoever else has made a cracker
or nger 'joke' or a real hateful statement and reasons why, and they like... elbow you and try to get you to agree or go along with it.
Any family member or close friend. With much less class or tact than yourself. DONT SAY NO!
In fact think of who I'm talking about. Are they still to this day racist? With a scowl or frown out of the corner of their eye when thinking or talking about a different race or type of person they don't like?
"Yea and that's just [relative here] they'll always be like that."
YEP. Cuz they're old and outdated.
They've never used a computer or had a taste of world culture either.
Can you imagine putting them on ventrilo with your clan or group or something to mic chat with everyone around the world? It would open their eyes really quick, I've done that to people. They start to grasp they are no longer the center of the world and nobody fuckin' cares about their nasty bigoted opinions. Shut the fuck up and cover me while I spray my machinegun over this crate. Shut the fuck up and meet me in [MMO town here] and send a trade. STFU and [work with us not against us it's in YOUR BENEFIT] if you wanna keep on here with us.
THAT SHIT CURES RACISM MAN if you do it right.
Make them feel part of something better than their miserable, lonely self and they'd rather be part of it almost become addicted to it.
I gotta try that with Ralph Smole and see how it goes.
Remember watching old Star Trek: Next Generations?
That's total inspiration for world peace, they really made it look like it all could work after removing alot of the strife from our society like hunger money addictive drugs and whatever other magic wand they waved.
---
þ Synchronet þ Kettering Square BBS w00t!
//- With quill in hand, Finnigann
sends off a short note to Slink,
about Re: Interestingly Enough. -\\
Hey all,
I do not like that word at all either.. I would have to agree that it conveys a lot of hate, however, I don't believe in censorship either.
Nothing but hate. I think I was talking about internal control.
Censorship is me telling you what you can/cannot say.
It is really a good thing that people can say those words. It gives us an opportunity to see how we have grown as a society, and how far we
There are far better ways to make that measurement.
are moving to bridge the gap between black and white cultures. So far, most people really dislike that word, however we do know that some out there still have the tendency to make race a divider between them. Not just whites, but blacks as well. If censorship was in place, how would we know where the problem spots were?? Sometimes it's nice to have the opportunity to be offended every now and again, it gives us a place to focus our efforts to promote change. Besides, when it is all done and over with, the real judge of us all is God and him alone.
Saddly, censorship does not stop people, it only makes it a crime. Self
control is the only real answer. When people stop feeling the hate,
then those words will fade away.
AND when it's all said and done, it will be all siad and done. There
isn't any magical being gonna pin a badge on anyone.
If you choose to be a good person, it is far better you do it for the
right reasons. If you think you will get into heaven by not calling me
a nigger, then you'd better be calling me a nigger. Cause there ain't
no such a ting as heaven. It is far better you realise the hurt you
cause (and many times more than just hurt) with words like nigger. Your
not earning a seat on the heaven express.
And lastly, TOP POSTING is really bad form. That right there will knock
you off the Heaven Express.
niggerSlink
With regards to the social ramifications;Mrproper wrote to Finnigann <=-
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: Finnigann to Mrproper on Tue Nov 13 2007 12:39 pm
Where is it you find WHITE people upset (as if they had been singled
out) by saying N*gger?
It's all over the news these days.. and at times I use the word
and it pisses people I know off.. just as you just censored the word nigger, WHY are you using that word in a derrogatory nature against anyone? Why must you censor yourself.
Because I personally hate that word. I hate what it means to nearly
everyone else. It's a word that means 'second class'.
You may try to alter it's meaning (as did another poster with the words
'gay' and 'fagot') But they are words that convey hate.
nature,Black comedians use the word nigger what gives them the right to do that? because by doing that they are using in in a slanderious
They also call whites crackers, who gives them the right to do that.
Not all do, and many wont. If they want to, it doesn't change my usage.
Nothing comes to mind as a 'white' slang. Perhaps 'craker'? Doesn't
convey hate to me and is a poor simile...
heWhen Micheal Richards was heckled at when doing his stand up comedy
called the group of people niggers, how did he know that group of people could have been white people, hispanics, arabs or whatever..
I didn't see/hear that. But does anyone think he meant anyone other
than black people?
forBut to sum it up, yes I've had a few white folks get pissed at me
asthatusing the word nigger, My black friends don't get mad for me using
word because they know I'm not using it in that context. I'm not a racially motivated person, I look at one human being just the same
sometimesthe next, I will not judge anyone by their religion either,
I
might have a good debate with them but I'm not judgmental to them.
If you really respect your black friends, you'd find another word to
use. I seriously doubt they understand your views as being totally
benign.
The word stings.
Hope that covers my views on the word NIGGER and why it should'nt be censored.
A lot of people try to say, "... but NOT me!" It's not entirely YOUR
perception that is the deciding factor.
What's that old sig block...
I know you think you understand what I said.
But what you don't understand,
what I said, wasn't what I meant.
sayand I still would like to know why all these white movie stars who
onnigger are tarred an feathered on the media and then have to go kiss jesse jackson or al sharptons ass for an apology, while at the same time black and hispanic or other ethnic stars can say nigger, spic, cracker, camel jocky, or whatever else without the least little buzz
the media.
You might, someday.
Did you ever see/read the work, 'Black Like Me'?
A journalist takes some medication that causes his skin to darken. In
the movie, he looks black.
He tells of his life afterwards. Things changed for him, just because
of his skin color. Same man. Different reactions. Of course the blacks
that he met treated him differently also. It works two ways. No one is
exempt. It may not be an issue in a homogenous enviroment, but it's
there nontheless, just below the surface.
Perhaps it has survival benefits. Beware of anyone not of our clan.
Different is dangerous. But we don't live in tiny groups any more.
Attitudes can change. I hope so anyway.
When you make the finding yourself - even if
you're the last person on Earth to see the
light - you'll never forget it. -- Carl Sagan
... Chopped cabbage: It's not just a good idea, it's the slaw!
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.47
þ Synchronet þ Bits-N-Bytes - bnb.dtdns.net / bnb.synchro.net (web use port 666)
I'm not sure what top posting is, but if it gets me kicked off heaven expres or whatever, I suppose i'm not missing very much.. Not sure why you seem so angry in this post, but you don't seem very much like a nice person at all. hope the best for you and yours..
Thanks!
Slink.
//- With quill in hand, Finnigann
sends off a short note to Slink,
about Re: Interestingly Enough. -\\
Hey all,
I do not like that word at all either.. I would have to agree that conveys a lot of hate, however, I don't believe in censorship either
I'm not sure what top posting is, but if it gets me kicked off heaven express or whatever, I suppose i'm not missing very much.. Not sure why you seem so angry in this post, but you don't seem very much like a
nice person at all. I hope the best for you and yours..
Thanks!
Slink.
//- With quill in hand, Finnigann
sends off a short note to Slink,
about Re: Interestingly Enough. -\\
Hey all,
I do not like that word at all either.. I would have to agree that it conveys a lot of hate, however, I don't believe in censorship either.
Nothing but hate. I think I was talking about internal control.
Censorship is me telling you what you can/cannot say.
It is really a good thing that people can say those words. It gives us an opportunity to see how we have grown as a society, and how far we
There are far better ways to make that measurement.
are moving to bridge the gap between black and white cultures. So far, most people really dislike that word, however we do know that some out there still have the tendency to make race a divider between them. Not just whites, but blacks as well. If censorship was in place, how would we know where the problem spots were?? Sometimes it's nice to have the opportunity to be offended every now and again, it gives us a place to focus our efforts to promote change. Besides, when it is all done and over with, the real judge of us all is God and him alone.
Saddly, censorship does not stop people, it only makes it a crime. Self
control is the only real answer. When people stop feeling the hate,
then those words will fade away.
AND when it's all said and done, it will be all siad and done. There
isn't any magical being gonna pin a badge on anyone.
If you choose to be a good person, it is far better you do it for the
right reasons. If you think you will get into heaven by not calling me
a nigger, then you'd better be calling me a nigger. Cause there ain't
no such a ting as heaven. It is far better you realise the hurt you
cause (and many times more than just hurt) with words like nigger. Your
not earning a seat on the heaven express.
And lastly, TOP POSTING is really bad form. That right there will knock
you off the Heaven Express.
Slink
With regards to the social ramifications;Mrproper wrote to Finnigann <=-
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: Finnigann to Mrproper on Tue Nov 13 2007 12:39 pm
Where is it you find WHITE people upset (as if they had been singled
out) by saying N*gger?
niggerIt's all over the news these days.. and at times I use the word
and it pisses people I know off.. just as you just censored the word nigger, WHY are you using that word in a derrogatory nature against anyone? Why must you censor yourself.
Because I personally hate that word. I hate what it means to nearly
everyone else. It's a word that means 'second class'.
You may try to alter it's meaning (as did another poster with the words
'gay' and 'fagot') But they are words that convey hate.
nature,Black comedians use the word nigger what gives them the right to do that? because by doing that they are using in in a slanderious
They also call whites crackers, who gives them the right to do that.
Not all do, and many wont. If they want to, it doesn't change my usage.
Nothing comes to mind as a 'white' slang. Perhaps 'craker'? Doesn't
convey hate to me and is a poor simile...
heWhen Micheal Richards was heckled at when doing his stand up comedy
called the group of people niggers, how did he know that group of people could have been white people, hispanics, arabs or whatever..
I didn't see/hear that. But does anyone think he meant anyone other
than black people?
forBut to sum it up, yes I've had a few white folks get pissed at me
thatusing the word nigger, My black friends don't get mad for me using
asword because they know I'm not using it in that context. I'm not a racially motivated person, I look at one human being just the same
sometimesthe next, I will not judge anyone by their religion either,
I
might have a good debate with them but I'm not judgmental to them.
If you really respect your black friends, you'd find another word to
use. I seriously doubt they understand your views as being totally
benign.
The word stings.
Hope that covers my views on the word NIGGER and why it should'nt be censored.
A lot of people try to say, "... but NOT me!" It's not entirely YOUR
perception that is the deciding factor.
What's that old sig block...
I know you think you understand what I said.
But what you don't understand,
what I said, wasn't what I meant.
sayand I still would like to know why all these white movie stars who
onnigger are tarred an feathered on the media and then have to go kiss jesse jackson or al sharptons ass for an apology, while at the same time black and hispanic or other ethnic stars can say nigger, spic, cracker, camel jocky, or whatever else without the least little buzz
the media.
You might, someday.
Did you ever see/read the work, 'Black Like Me'?
A journalist takes some medication that causes his skin to darken. In
the movie, he looks black.
He tells of his life afterwards. Things changed for him, just because
of his skin color. Same man. Different reactions. Of course the blacks
that he met treated him differently also. It works two ways. No one is
exempt. It may not be an issue in a homogenous enviroment, but it's
there nontheless, just below the surface.
Perhaps it has survival benefits. Beware of anyone not of our clan.
Different is dangerous. But we don't live in tiny groups any more.
Attitudes can change. I hope so anyway.
When you make the finding yourself - even if
you're the last person on Earth to see the
light - you'll never forget it. -- Carl Sagan
... Chopped cabbage: It's not just a good idea, it's the slaw!
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.47
þ Synchronet þ Bits-N-Bytes - bnb.dtdns.net / bnb.synchro.net (web use port 666)
---
þ Synchronet þ WhatWriter - whatwriter.servebbs.com
On DOVE-Net, we bottom-post.
On DOVE-Net, we bottom-post.
As opposed to Fido, where they bottom-feed.
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: Ralph Smole to Angus McLeod on Wed Jan 30 2008 06:31:00
On DOVE-Net, we bottom-post.
As opposed to Fido, where they bottom-feed.
Good one, Ralph!
Good one, Ralph!
Thanks,Angus :-)
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.so
By: Slink to Finnigann on Tue Jan 29 2008 14:02:00
I'm not sure what top posting is, but if it gets me kicked off heavenexpres
or whatever, I suppose i'm not missing very much.. Not sure why you seem
all.angry in this post, but you don't seem very much like a nice person at
hope the best for you and yours..
Thanks!
Slink.
//- With quill in hand, Finnigann
sends off a short note to Slink,
about Re: Interestingly Enough. -\\
Hey all,
thatI do not like that word at all either.. I would have to agree
eitherconveys a lot of hate, however, I don't believe in censorship
'Top-posting' is when you post your reply *above* the quoted text instead of *below* (which is called, believe it or not, 'Bottom-posting'.
On DOVE-Net, we bottom-post.
---
Playing: "Insane" by "Texas" from the "White on blonde" album.
þ Synchronet þ Oh God! It's HIM again..... The guy from The ANJO BBS!
//- With quill in hand, Finnigann
sends off a short note to Slink,
about Re: Interestingly Enough. -\\
I'm not sure what top posting is, but if it gets me kicked off heaven express or whatever, I suppose i'm not missing very much.. Not sure why you seem so angry in this post, but you don't seem very much like a nice person at all. I hope the best for you and yours..
Top posting (Thanks for yet another example) is posting your reply
ABOVE the message you are posting to. But what *I* think you are
unsure of is why it's important. (TOP POSTING is after all fairly self
explanitory) But looking back... your reply doesn't make as much sense
as if it had been placed after the parts you are replying to.
Infact it reads backasswards. Answers comming along on the page before
the questions.
And as far as my anger goes... It's all in the text below.
BTW, along with TOP POSTING not editing out such things like taglines, signature blocks and parts of the message NOT related to your reply is
also rude.
I know you don't want to be rude. OR even thought of as being rude, so
you will work at posting as outlined (It's not just me saying this, it's really a better way to handle threaded messages) and delete or otherwise edit out unwanted parts. That way we get a short, to the point exchange
of ideas.
either.Thanks!
Slink.
//- With quill in hand, Finnigann
sends off a short note to Slink,
about Re: Interestingly Enough. -\\
Hey all,
itI do not like that word at all either.. I would have to agree that
conveys a lot of hate, however, I don't believe in censorship
usNothing but hate. I think I was talking about internal control.
Censorship is me telling you what you can/cannot say.
It is really a good thing that people can say those words. It gives
an opportunity to see how we have grown as a society, and how far we
There are far better ways to make that measurement.
far,are moving to bridge the gap between black and white cultures. So
outmost people really dislike that word, however we do know that some
Notthere still have the tendency to make race a divider between them.
wouldjust whites, but blacks as well. If censorship was in place, how
thewe know where the problem spots were?? Sometimes it's nice to have
toopportunity to be offended every now and again, it gives us a place
andfocus our efforts to promote change. Besides, when it is all done
over with, the real judge of us all is God and him alone.
Saddly, censorship does not stop people, it only makes it a crime. Self
control is the only real answer. When people stop feeling the hate,
then those words will fade away.
AND when it's all said and done, it will be all siad and done. There
isn't any magical being gonna pin a badge on anyone.
If you choose to be a good person, it is far better you do it for the
right reasons. If you think you will get into heaven by not calling me
a nigger, then you'd better be calling me a nigger. Cause there ain't
no such a ting as heaven. It is far better you realise the hurt you
cause (and many times more than just hurt) with words like nigger. Your
not earning a seat on the heaven express.
And lastly, TOP POSTING is really bad form. That right there will knock
you off the Heaven Express.
singledSlink
With regards to the social ramifications;Mrproper wrote to Finnigann <=-
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: Finnigann to Mrproper on Tue Nov 13 2007 12:39 pm
Where is it you find WHITE people upset (as if they had been
againstout) by saying N*gger?
wordniggerIt's all over the news these days.. and at times I use the word
and it pisses people I know off.. just as you just censored the
nigger, WHY are you using that word in a derrogatory nature
wordsanyone? Why must you censor yourself.
Because I personally hate that word. I hate what it means to nearly
everyone else. It's a word that means 'second class'.
You may try to alter it's meaning (as did another poster with the
'gay' and 'fagot') But they are words that convey hate.
doBlack comedians use the word nigger what gives them the right to
usage.that.nature,that? because by doing that they are using in in a slanderious
They also call whites crackers, who gives them the right to do
Not all do, and many wont. If they want to, it doesn't change my
Nothing comes to mind as a 'white' slang. Perhaps 'craker'? Doesn't
convey hate to me and is a poor simile...
comedyWhen Micheal Richards was heckled at when doing his stand up
whatever..he
called the group of people niggers, how did he know that group of people could have been white people, hispanics, arabs or
I didn't see/hear that. But does anyone think he meant anyone other
than black people?
usingforBut to sum it up, yes I've had a few white folks get pissed at me
using the word nigger, My black friends don't get mad for me
athat
word because they know I'm not using it in that context. I'm not
sameracially motivated person, I look at one human being just the
them.as
sometimesthe next, I will not judge anyone by their religion either,
I
might have a good debate with them but I'm not judgmental to
If you really respect your black friends, you'd find another word to
use. I seriously doubt they understand your views as being totally
benign.
The word stings.
beHope that covers my views on the word NIGGER and why it should'nt
censored.
A lot of people try to say, "... but NOT me!" It's not entirely YOUR
perception that is the deciding factor.
What's that old sig block...
I know you think you understand what I said.
But what you don't understand,
what I said, wasn't what I meant.
whoand I still would like to know why all these white movie stars
samesaykiss
nigger are tarred an feathered on the media and then have to go
jesse jackson or al sharptons ass for an apology, while at the
spic,time black and hispanic or other ethnic stars can say nigger,
blacksbuzzcracker, camel jocky, or whatever else without the least little
on
the media.
You might, someday.
Did you ever see/read the work, 'Black Like Me'?
A journalist takes some medication that causes his skin to darken. In
the movie, he looks black.
He tells of his life afterwards. Things changed for him, just because
of his skin color. Same man. Different reactions. Of course the
isthat he met treated him differently also. It works two ways. No one
exempt. It may not be an issue in a homogenous enviroment, but it's
there nontheless, just below the surface.
Perhaps it has survival benefits. Beware of anyone not of our clan.
Different is dangerous. But we don't live in tiny groups any more.
Attitudes can change. I hope so anyway.
When you make the finding yourself - even if
you're the last person on Earth to see the
light - you'll never forget it. -- Carl Sagan
... Chopped cabbage: It's not just a good idea, it's the slaw!port
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.47
þ Synchronet þ Bits-N-Bytes - bnb.dtdns.net / bnb.synchro.net (web use
666)
---
þ Synchronet þ WhatWriter - whatwriter.servebbs.com
When you make the finding yourself - even if
you're the last person on Earth to see the
light - you'll never forget it. -- Carl Sagan
... "This ship will not survive the formation of the cosmos!"
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.47
þ Synchronet þ Bits-N-Bytes - bnb.dtdns.net / bnb.synchro.net (web use port 666)
'Top-posting' is when you post your reply *above* the quoted text instead of *below* (which is called, believe it or not, 'Bottom-posting'.
On DOVE-Net, we bottom-post.
Ahhhh.... I see.. seems like a silly rule...
For these reasons, BBS networks (certainly all those *I* have ever read) prefer to employ bottom-posting.
Dude when I put a 90 page post it at least contains a point or rightfully annoys the intended target.
You are increasingly annoying me... If all you can do is insult people
who didn't do anything to you in the first place, why not just go
away??
I just don't get this anymore. If all you have to do is be a constant
ass, can't you do it in the privacy of your own home? You rarely offer anything to help anyone out, as well as NEVER being nice to anyone.
People like YOU are the reason this network is going downhill (more
like off a cliff)...
---SNIP---You are increasingly annoying me... If all you can do is insult people who didn't do anything to you in the first place, why not just go
away??
SHUT the FUCK UP Terry OH MY GOD :O
I said one fuckin' thing to him! About time you notice, anyway.
It wasn't even a big rant it was just my 19th poke at Angus after he's long "filtered" me. You just think I'm too dumb to realize that part. I was
---SNIP---
Typical 200 line BS post about nothing.
fuck your ENTIRE FAMILY lol
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: The Immortal to W8ZZU on Tue Feb 19 2008 12:46 am
fuck your ENTIRE FAMILY lol
You don't want to start that shit.. trust me.
Jason - W8ZZU
Total Logged Contacts = 1742
Last Contact: KI4JEK on 40 SSB. Location: VA. 1/27/08 at 21:30 UTC
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: The Immortal to W8ZZU on Tue Feb 19 2008 12:46 am
fuck your ENTIRE FAMILY lol
You don't want to start that shit.. trust me.
Been a long time, but must update the twitlist.
Ralph Smole -- www.ralphsmole.com and www.bullishmcgee.com
SHUT the FUCK UP Terry OH MY GOD :O
You don't want to start that shit.. trust me.
fuck your ENTIRE FAMILY lol
You don't want to start that shit.. trust me.
k sry
You don't want to start that shit.. trust me.
He thinks everything is funny.... He'll wind up with someone leaving
him bleeding somewhere in a ditch if he talks to people like that in
real life...
you suck
learn to edit text how the hell do you even turn on your PC sometimes jeez
...aaaaand someone finally said it.
Learn to leave the 25 extra lines out of the bottom of your message...
....Terry with the assist! TOUCHE pussy maybe it's not my fault when
using fsedit on someone elses bbs!
....Terry with the assist! TOUCHE pussy maybe it's not my fault when
using fsedit on someone elses bbs!
Don't you love how I pop in and help out those like you in deep need
of aid?!
And you shouldn't call someone a pussy over the internet, that is
safe.. And since there is no way you would do it in person, not and
like it anyhow, you shouldn't utter the word.
You are kinda funny sometimes though, I'll give you that much... I get
a chuckle every once in a while from you. And you are SO easy toget
riled up...
Terry
HUSH BEFORE I COME TO YOUR HOUSE AND WHIP UR ASS IN REAL LIFE AND TAKE UR PC AND USE IT TO STORE NOTHING BUT COMPRESSED TEXT
PUSSY
lol
who are you helping anyway
missed it
Re: Re: Interestingly Enough.
By: Slink to Finnigann on Tue Jan 29 2008 14:02:00
I'm not sure what top posting is, but if it gets me kicked off heavenexpres
or whatever, I suppose i'm not missing very much.. Not sure why you seemso
angry in this post, but you don't seem very much like a nice person atall.
hope the best for you and yours..
Thanks!
Slink.
'Top-posting' is when you post your reply *above* the quoted text instead
of *below* (which is called, believe it or not, 'Bottom-posting'.
On DOVE-Net, we bottom-post.
Ahhhh.... I see.. seems like a silly rule...
Sysop: | MCMLXXIX |
---|---|
Location: | Prospect, CT |
Users: | 333 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 15:34:14 |
Calls: | 574 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Messages: | 235853 |