• Done with ignorant folks

    From Noachian@VERT to All on Friday, August 10, 2007 22:55:14
    Hello all!

    Seeing that the resident, cool-guy atheists of this BBS message board have not responded to my latest comments, it is obvious that they have seen the error in their entire argument.

    Now that I have proved their flawed analogy false and because of their refusal to provide any contact information so that I may send them proof (which they asked for) that their analogy is false, and due in no small part to the fact that they can produce no scientific evidence to prove that: 1) The supernatural is part of the natural world, 2) that the supernatural is a negative, and 3) that God doesn't exist, it seems that they may be retreating into their ignorant, hypocritical and egotistical atheist minds.

    How unfortunate!

    With that, I would like to wish those awesome, cool-guy atheists of the BBS world well. And I would also like to convey the following:

    I pray for you. I pray that some day, sooner rather than later, you will come to understand a truth on your own, and that you will experience the full love, guidance, compassion, and respect for others that is available to you at any time from God, and His Son, rather than only consider the possibility in the face of your fear of eternal nothingness due to your lack of a relationship with the truth. Yes, that's right. The truth. The truth which can not be addressed by science, and that which does not need to be proved by anything of this earth.

    God bless you, one and all. :)

    Undoubtedly, the "I have to have the last word!" arguments and responses will follow which will I'm sure, consist of the same, repetitive atheistic comments they've been regurgitating over the past hundreds and hundreds of posts. The SAME comments, which they have no scientific basis for. Again, which is incredibly ironic due to their continued championing of "scientific proof," which is as I've alluded to in a previous post, incredibly dogmatic in it's own right.

    God bless!

    Alright you atheists, you can say whatever BS you want in response to this and be done! Cool! Now get off this BBS on a Friday night and go get a life!

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net
  • From Angus McLeod@VERT/ANJO to Noachian on Saturday, August 11, 2007 07:44:00
    Re: Done with ignorant folks
    By: Noachian to All on Fri Aug 10 2007 22:55:00

    Seeing that the resident, cool-guy atheists of this BBS message board have n responded to my latest comments, it is obvious that they have seen the error their entire argument.

    I respond to most of your comments, illogical though they may be. And I
    must say that they are becoming woodenly repetative.

    But I hope you will allow me some time away from the keyboard, for sleep,
    food and other matters? Or will you start telling me to update my
    QWK-packets more frequently?

    Now that I have proved their flawed analogy false and because of their refus to provide any contact information so that I may send them proof (which they asked for) that their analogy is false, and due in no small part to the fact that they can produce no scientific evidence to prove that...

    You have proved that their proof is false because they won't help you to
    prove YOUR proof of the fact that their proof is false because they won't provide you with proof.....

    How unfortunate!

    How amusing!

    I pray for you. I pray that some day, sooner rather than later...

    Are you praying to the tooth fairy? Or the easter bunny?

    ---
    Playing loud: "Blue room" by "The Orb" from the "U. F. Orb" album.
    þ Synchronet þ Oh God! It's HIM again..... The guy from The ANJO BBS!
  • From Finnigann@VERT/BNB to Noachian on Saturday, August 11, 2007 07:44:00
    Without regards to the social ramifications;
    Noachian wrote to All <=-

    Hello all!

    Seeing that the resident, cool-guy atheists of this BBS message board
    have not responded to my latest comments, it is obvious that they have seen the error in their entire argument.

    You should shorten your good-bye message. I think if you are this weak,
    You'll be giving it alot...

    If you think you have been the least bit logical in any of this, you
    are mistaken (a whole lot mistaken)

    So does this mean I shouldn't berate the postal worker when I don't
    actually find the PROOF in my mail box?



    For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe
    as it really is than to persist in delusion,
    however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan

    ... "I'm worth a million in prizes"
    --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49
    þ Synchronet þ Bits-N-Bytes - bnb.dtdns.net / bnb.synchro.net - One Hellofa BBS
  • From Dennis@VERT/DENNISCA to Noachian on Saturday, August 11, 2007 07:34:00
    Re: Done with ignorant folks
    By: Noachian to All on Fri Aug 10 2007 22:55:00

    OTE: TIDE 1.11
    Alright you atheists, you can say whatever BS you want in response to this a be done! Cool! Now get off this BBS on a Friday night and go get a life!

    Here's some scientific proof for you: You've recommended that others
    "get off this BBS on a Friday night and go get a life" repeatedly
    whilst you continue to spew out messages (at an alarming pace).

    Now, I'm not the kind of person who makes assumptions without warrant,
    but I did note that you constantly accuse others of hypocrisy. Just
    an observation for you.


    God bless!

    Which god? The black lesbian one?

    __
    Dennis


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Premier BBS (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) -- telnet://dennis.ca
  • From Deuce@VERT/SYNCNIX to Noachian on Saturday, August 11, 2007 17:57:00
    Re: Done with ignorant folks
    By: Noachian to All on Fri Aug 10 2007 10:55 pm

    that: 1) The supernatural is part of the natural world, 2) that the supernatural is a negative, and 3) that God doesn't exist, it seems that they may be retreating into their ignorant, hypocritical and egotistical atheist minds.

    1) That's because you're using different definitions of "natural world" than everyone else. I noticed you refused to clarify or provide some alternate definition besides the one which make watches supernatural. As a result supernatural (whos definition rlies on that of the natural world) cannot be defined. We gave a definition of natural world which you rejected, but you have not come up with any other definition.
    2) See #1

    Should you come up with a definition of "natural world" and "supernatural" which are consistent, the discussion can progress. Until that point, only useless babeling can occur.

    ---
    Synchronet - Jump on the Web 0.2 bandwagon!

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ My Brand-New BBS (All the cool SysOps run STOCK!)