New weight loss plan, garanteed to lose pounds quicker than ever before! n>Just watch one hour of Wendy Wright, and you will be making so many trips to n>the John to purge your stomach of its conents, you will be on a fast track to n>losing as much weigh as you see fit. Watch her an hour a day for one week and n>just see the results! Call now!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=US8f1w1cYvs
Nightcrawler +o Dark Sanctuary
darksanctuary.servebbs.com
New weight loss plan, garanteed to lose pounds quicker than ever before! n>Just watch one hour of Wendy Wright, and you will be making so many trips to n>the John to purge your stomach of its conents, you will be on a fast track to n>losing as much weigh as you see fit. Watch her an hour a day for one week and n>just see the results! Call now!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=US8f1w1cYvs
Nightcrawler +o Dark Sanctuary
darksanctuary.servebbs.com
Funny how he accuses fundies of profiting from obscuring the truth in the ve paragraph that comes from a "for sale" page on his website where he is selli book that falsely creates a black-and-white strawman that any faith is incompatible with reason.
So your are saying that there is a form of faith that IS logical?
Can you list examples?
Re: New weight loss plan!
By: nightcrawler to Curt on Thu Jan 21 2010 04:05 am
So your are saying that there is a form of faith that IS logical?
Can you list examples?
Though most of us "logic-minded" folk are unlikely to admit it, even a foundation of science requires an explicit investment in faith, in that sinc all our "truths" are hypotheses, we must have faith that our data are accura
With few exceptions, our "empirical" data are, by definition, subject to hu error and misinterpretation.
The difference between our faith and theological faith is that the man of logic-based faith has the ability (and oft times responsibility) to admit th his faith may be in error, which leads to growth and further discovery, wher the man of religion-based faith must never waver, lest he be condemned.
foundation of science requires an explicit investment in faith, in that sinc all our "truths" are hypotheses, we must have faith that our data are accura
With few exceptions, our "empirical" data are, by definition, subject
to hu error and misinterpretation.
That's complete, utter horseshit. No need to continue - it's crap, it was crap when you wrote it, and it's crap now that I read it.
The difference between our faith and theological faith is that the man
of logic-based faith has the ability (and oft times responsibility) to admit th his faith may be in error, which leads to growth and further discovery, wher the man of religion-based faith must never waver, lest
he be condemned.
This is semantic vocabulary masturbation. It serves no purpose except for your own delusional self-pleasure.
That's complete, utter horseshit. No need to continue - it's crap, it was c when you wrote it, and it's crap now that I read it.
This is semantic vocabulary masturbation. It serves no purpose except for y own delusional self-pleasure.
The difference between our faith and theological faith is that the man of S>logic-based faith has the ability (and oft times responsibility) to admit that
his faith may be in error, which leads to growth and further discovery, wherea
the man of religion-based faith must never waver, lest he be condemned.
faith in religion can waiver, it does all the time.. why do you think the worl
has been at war since the texts have been written.
Sysop: | MCMLXXIX |
---|---|
Location: | Prospect, CT |
Users: | 333 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 15:37:41 |
Calls: | 574 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Messages: | 235853 |