I guess one thing I'd love to see is a control panel for Linux/Unix like
the Windows version of Sync uses. I first setup Sync on Windwos 2000 in 2000 and the Control Panel was nice. I can get the same stuff via command line options in Linux, but having a GUI interface or even web-based interface would be cool. But Sync on *Nix rocks!
Re: BSD
By: Digital Man to Corey on Wed Jan 13 2010 01:16 pm
Re: BSD
By: Corey to Digital Man on Tue Jan 12 2010 06:56 pm
Re: BSD
By: Digital Man to Corey on Tue Jan 12 2010 06:20 pm
Re: BSD
By: Corey to Ib Joe on Fri Jan 08 2010 01:46 pm
Re: BSD
By: Ib Joe to Sam Alexander on Fri Jan 08 2010 10:52 am
I think Ubuntu is coughing on the gmake statement... the
ones found in the instructions given.
I use ubuntu 9 and the gnu make is installed as make.
but you need to copy the GNUmakefile to makefile.
make -f GNUmakefile should work just fine. NO need to copy or rename GNUmakefile.
digital man
Snapple "Real Fact" #33:
Termites eat through wood two times faster when listening to rock musi
hmm, never thought of that.
now how do I rename all the synch files to lowercase?
Deuce posted a command-line (to you, iirc) using 'mmv' to do this.
I must have missed it. whats the command again?
Re: BSD
By: Ib Joe to Digital Man on Tue Feb 02 2010 12:51 am
Re: BSD
By: Digital Man to Corey on Tue Jan 12 2010 06:20 pm
I use ubuntu 9 and the gnu make is installed as make.
but you need to copy the GNUmakefile to makefile.
make -f GNUmakefile should work just fine. NO need to copy or rename GNUmakefile.
This drives me nuts... I didn't see this in your setup instructions...
You don't normally need to use the '-f' option.
digital man
Snapple "Real Fact" #126:
A pigeon's feathers are heavier than its bones.
I hear you, it drove me nuts too, and I could swear I didn't see it inThis drives me nuts... I didn't see this in your setupI use ubuntu 9 and the gnu make is installed as make.make -f GNUmakefile should work just fine. NO need to copy or
but you need to copy the GNUmakefile to makefile.
rename GNUmakefile.
instructions...
Good grief, Linux is *SUPPOSED TO BE BETTER*, not more aggrivating!
Good grief, Linux is *SUPPOSED TO BE BETTER*, not more aggrivating!
Re: BSD
By: John Guillory to Ronald Reid on Tue Jul 10 2012 03:03 pm
Good grief, Linux is *SUPPOSED TO BE BETTER*, not more aggrivating!
I've never understood where this myth comes from.
Good grief, Linux is *SUPPOSED TO BE BETTER*, not more
aggrivating!
I've never understood where this myth comes from.
apples use bsd. from thier iphones to tablets to desktops.
Sysop: | MCMLXXIX |
---|---|
Location: | Prospect, CT |
Users: | 325 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 13:07:55 |
Calls: | 508 |
Messages: | 219963 |