• Futaba 14MZ at Tower...

    From Angus Mcleod@VERT/ANJO to All on Thursday, December 09, 2004 13:28:00
    If you have $2,299 spare and want to get into flying R/C, can I draw your attention to the new Futaba transmitter which comes complete with WinCE?

    It looks like a damned good tranny, apart from the Microsoft crap, and i'm hoping that (since a change in compact-flash card will upgrade your
    software) that something a bit more reliable will appear on this machine
    some day.

    http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXJHG6&P=0

    14 channels! Woot!



    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Made of wood and glue, but mostly glue!
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Angus Mcleod on Thursday, December 09, 2004 16:47:59
    Re: Futaba 14MZ at Tower...
    By: Angus Mcleod to All on Thu Dec 09 2004 01:28 pm

    If you have $2,299 spare and want to get into flying R/C, can I draw your attention to the new Futaba transmitter which comes complete with WinCE?

    It looks like a damned good tranny, apart from the Microsoft crap, and i'm hoping that (since a change in compact-flash card will upgrade your software) that something a bit more reliable will appear on this machine some day.

    http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXJHG6&P=0

    14 channels! Woot!

    I honestly don't know of any reports that Windows CE (or any other embedded version of Windows) is inherently unstable. If you don't want to run WinCE because you hate M$, that's one thing, but all the embedded Windows devices I've developed for and/or owned, have been *at least* as stable as the embedded Linux devices I've developed for and/or owned.

    digital man

    Snapple "Real Fact" #92:
    Fish can drown.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net
  • From Angus Mcleod@VERT/ANJO to Digital Man on Thursday, December 09, 2004 21:40:00
    Re: Futaba 14MZ at Tower...
    By: Digital Man to Angus Mcleod on Thu Dec 09 2004 16:47:00

    I honestly don't know of any reports that Windows CE (or any other embedded version of Windows) is inherently unstable. If you don't want to run WinCE because you hate M$, that's one thing, but all the embedded Windows devices I've developed for and/or owned, have been *at least* as stable as the embed Linux devices I've developed for and/or owned.

    It probably isn't an issue anyway. The unit has two CPUs, one to run the interface (WinCE) and one to run the actual transmitter. I have no idea
    what effect on functionality it would have if the OS crashed, but
    hopefully the core functions of actually flying the plane would continue
    to operate. IOW, hopefully the loss of the OS on the user-interface
    wouldn't render the controls inpoerative.

    And yeah, I hate M$ for being the minions of hell that they are and would prefer to use some other OS, but I am not fanatical about it. If the
    tranny proves to be a good one (I'll let a few thousand other pilots test-drive and report back) then I wouldn't refuse one. If someone laid
    the $2.2K on me. :-)

    Actually, what I think is needed is to offload the majority of the user-interface to a PC application. You set up any particular model using
    a graphical app. that allows you to connect inputs (like stick and switch position, clocks, battery level, etc) to processors (like mixers,
    integrators, filters, delay-lines, etc) and on to outputs (like servos, display, speaker, etc). When you've done the setup, you should be able to test the functionality on a simulation of an aircraft, so you can see control-surface deflection and whatnot on a graphical representation of
    the aircraft. When all is to your liking, you then "compile" the configuration into a low-level code that gets written to the transmitter. In-field programming should never be too complicated or complex, so a
    great deal of the on-tranny user-interface can be eliminated.

    This 14MZ has some really nice features, though.


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Made of wood and glue, but mostly glue!