Being a AMD fan I haven't kept up with the Intel Ix processors to know
what speed they are able to run at.
I've haven't even looked at what the latest AMD processors can run at either.
The reviews say that Intel has the better (faster) processors right now in terms of processing power, but that the AMD CPUs have the better graphics capabilities. I guess it makes sense considering AMD bought out ATI.From what I remember, most of AMD's extra instructions was geared towards
From what I remember, most of AMD's extra instructions was
geared towards 3D Graphics. Granted, sse is supposed to be sorta
geared for graphics, but not quite like AMD's instructions...
For me OFFLINE reading was much better than DIAL-UP ONLINE reading was.
I still swear by my offline reader. It wasn't until SlyEdit came along
that I found an online full-screen editor I liked, but I've got an old DOS
Re: Money
By: Poindexter Fortran to Ed Vance on Wed Aug 15 2012 08:11:27
For me OFFLINE reading was much better than DIAL-UP ONLINE reading was.
I still swear by my offline reader. It wasn't until SlyEdit came along that I found an online full-screen editor I liked, but I've got an old DOS
I have always tended to read my BBS mail online, so I don't have much NI>experience with offline readers. What is the advnatage to using an offline NI>reader? I could see there being an advatnage back in the 80s and 90s, to NI>minimize phone charges by letting you just call in to exchange message packet
but that's not as much of an issue these days. One thing I would like, though
is something that can tell you which message areas have new messages written NI>you. When you log into a BBS, sometimes they tell you and sometimes they NI>don't, and I don't always remember which message areas I have posted in.
I tried using MultiMail some time ago, but for some reason I didn't really ge
into it - I think it was something about how it displayed the message boards NI>where the messages came from.. I seem to remember it displaying the short NI>message area codes used by the BBS rather than the full message area names.
I like reading messages Offline so much that I learned to use Mozilla Thunderbird to grab messages from my email account just so I don't have
to be connected to the Web Mail Server all the time I am reading and
writing email.
That is what I like doing, You can like how you do things, I'm not
looking over your shoulders telling you that what you are doing is
wrong. <GRIN>
As I said, I'm comfortable reading Offline, and I'm not trying to change
the way you enjoy using the BBS you use.
Sysop: | MCMLXXIX |
---|---|
Location: | Prospect, CT |
Users: | 325 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 61:29:33 |
Calls: | 508 |
Messages: | 220071 |