• AMD and Intel

    From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Ed Vance on Tuesday, August 14, 2012 07:49:59
    Re: Money
    By: Ed Vance to ROB MCCART on Sun Aug 12 2012 22:59:00

    Being a AMD fan I haven't kept up with the Intel Ix processors to know
    what speed they are able to run at.

    I've haven't even looked at what the latest AMD processors can run at either.

    The reviews say that Intel has the better (faster) processors right now in terms of processing power, but that the AMD CPUs have the better graphics capabilities. I guess it makes sense considering AMD bought out ATI.

    Nightfox


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion BBS - digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From John Guillory@VERT/MAINLINE to Nightfox on Tuesday, August 14, 2012 14:06:22
    Re: AMD and Intel
    By: Nightfox to Ed Vance on Tue Aug 14 2012 07:49:59

    The reviews say that Intel has the better (faster) processors right now in terms of processing power, but that the AMD CPUs have the better graphics capabilities. I guess it makes sense considering AMD bought out ATI.
    From what I remember, most of AMD's extra instructions was geared towards
    3D Graphics. Granted, sse is supposed to be sorta geared for graphics, but
    not quite like AMD's instructions...

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Roach Guts -- kingcoder.net
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to John Guillory on Tuesday, August 14, 2012 19:46:22
    Re: AMD and Intel
    By: John Guillory to Nightfox on Tue Aug 14 2012 14:06:22

    From what I remember, most of AMD's extra instructions was
    geared towards 3D Graphics. Granted, sse is supposed to be sorta
    geared for graphics, but not quite like AMD's instructions...

    Some time ago, AMD added their 3DNow instructions to their processors, but that's the only thing from AMD I remember being specific to 3D graphics, before they bought ATI just several years ago. Intel has added their own multimedia stuff to their CPUs too - MMX was a set of multimedia extensions to help aid in 3D graphics.

    Nightfox


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion BBS - digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Poindexter Fortran on Friday, August 17, 2012 07:33:12
    Re: Money
    By: Poindexter Fortran to Ed Vance on Wed Aug 15 2012 08:11:27

    For me OFFLINE reading was much better than DIAL-UP ONLINE reading was.

    I still swear by my offline reader. It wasn't until SlyEdit came along
    that I found an online full-screen editor I liked, but I've got an old DOS

    I have always tended to read my BBS mail online, so I don't have much experience with offline readers. What is the advnatage to using an offline reader? I could see there being an advatnage back in the 80s and 90s, to minimize phone charges by letting you just call in to exchange message packets, but that's not as much of an issue these days. One thing I would like, though, is something that can tell you which message areas have new messages written to you. When you log into a BBS, sometimes they tell you and sometimes they don't, and I don't always remember which message areas I have posted in.

    I tried using MultiMail some time ago, but for some reason I didn't really get into it - I think it was something about how it displayed the message boards where the messages came from.. I seem to remember it displaying the short message area codes used by the BBS rather than the full message area names.

    Nightfox


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion BBS - digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Ed Vance@VERT/CAPCITY2 to NIGHTFOX on Tuesday, August 21, 2012 21:48:00
    Re: Money
    By: Poindexter Fortran to Ed Vance on Wed Aug 15 2012 08:11:27

    For me OFFLINE reading was much better than DIAL-UP ONLINE reading was.

    I still swear by my offline reader. It wasn't until SlyEdit came along that I found an online full-screen editor I liked, but I've got an old DOS

    I have always tended to read my BBS mail online, so I don't have much NI>experience with offline readers. What is the advnatage to using an offline NI>reader? I could see there being an advatnage back in the 80s and 90s, to NI>minimize phone charges by letting you just call in to exchange message packet
    but that's not as much of an issue these days. One thing I would like, though
    is something that can tell you which message areas have new messages written NI>you. When you log into a BBS, sometimes they tell you and sometimes they NI>don't, and I don't always remember which message areas I have posted in.

    I tried using MultiMail some time ago, but for some reason I didn't really ge
    into it - I think it was something about how it displayed the message boards NI>where the messages came from.. I seem to remember it displaying the short NI>message area codes used by the BBS rather than the full message area names.

    Nightfox,

    In 1994 when I got my ibm compatiable computer and was calling Local
    BBS's using POTS I read echos until the BBS told me Time Was Up, and
    then I'd call the BBS later on to read some more messages in the echos.

    Sometime later I started using SLMR to read .QWK files from the BBS and
    to send .REP files I written to the BBS, I was only on the POTS a few
    minutes, which made the line free more than it had been in the past.

    Even though I use the internet now I still use SLMR and MultiMail DOS
    when I need to read a message that chokes SLMR.

    I like reading messages Offline so much that I learned to use Mozilla Thunderbird to grab messages from my email account just so I don't have
    to be connected to the Web Mail Server all the time I am reading and
    writing email.

    That is what I like doing, You can like how you do things, I'm not
    looking over your shoulders telling you that what you are doing is
    wrong. <GRIN>

    Like MultiMail, SLMR shows messages written to me from any the echos I
    use, in the first or second line of the echo list.

    When I click on the line I see the Message Numbers, which are different
    from each echo, and the entries on the list lets me guess which echo the
    reply to me is from and Who wrote it.

    For me to KNOW what echo it is from I just read the message where the
    Echo Name is displayed.

    As I said, I'm comfortable reading Offline, and I'm not trying to change
    the way you enjoy using the BBS you use.

    I'm glad You're here because you share what you know so we all can learn
    stuff about Technology.


    * SLMR 2.1a #T348 * Debuging: The other 90% of programming.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Capitol City Online - telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - 502-875-8938
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Ed Vance on Wednesday, August 22, 2012 22:09:43
    Re: Mail readers
    By: Ed Vance to NIGHTFOX on Tue Aug 21 2012 21:48:00

    I like reading messages Offline so much that I learned to use Mozilla Thunderbird to grab messages from my email account just so I don't have
    to be connected to the Web Mail Server all the time I am reading and
    writing email.

    I have set up Thunderbird to read mail and forums from my BBS too.. I think it's cool to be able to do that with Synchronet, although I haven't been using Thunderbird much these days.

    That is what I like doing, You can like how you do things, I'm not
    looking over your shoulders telling you that what you are doing is
    wrong. <GRIN>

    I never thought you were. :)

    As I said, I'm comfortable reading Offline, and I'm not trying to change
    the way you enjoy using the BBS you use.

    I tend to read messages and post from my own BBS.. I guess that may be one reason I tend not to use an offline reader - I have my own BBS, so I can be online with it and use it as much as I want.

    Nigthfox


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion BBS - digitaldistortionbbs.com