• Gun Grabbers

    From Thumper@VERT/THEWASTE to All on Wednesday, July 11, 2018 12:20:20
    There are multiple "assault weapons" bans being pushed throughout the
    country, there is legislation in Congress to enact an effective ban on handguns, an out of control California DOJ is pushing regulations that will criminalize millions of gun owners, and Democratic politicians are openly saying that they are coming to take your guns.

    We’re angry, frustrated, and upset at everything that is going on with the country and how these arrogant, self-centered, selfish leftists think they
    can run your life for you, violate your own personal decisions, override what you think is the best method of self-defense for yourself and your family,
    and take away your fundamental, God-given rights.

    -=Thumper=-
    Sysop
    The Wastelands BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ The Wastelands BBS, Copperopolis, CA
  • From DaiTengu@VERT/ENSEMBLE to Thumper on Saturday, July 14, 2018 10:33:03
    Re: Gun Grabbers
    By: Thumper to All on Wed Jul 11 2018 12:20 pm

    We’re angry, frustrated, and upset at everything that is going on with the country and how these arrogant, self-centered, selfish leftists think they can run your life for you, violate your own personal decisions, override what you think is the best method of self-defense for yourself and your family, and take away your fundamental, God-given rights.

    Hi, arrogant, self-centered, selfish leftist here.

    Also, I own guns.

    The best method of self-defense for yourself is the one that works for you, but does not unnecessarily risk harming others. That's why booby-trapping your property is illegal in (as far as I know) every state. For many large and explosive weapons the ATF has to sign off on civilian ownership.

    Therefore, if you think your best method of self-defense is mining your property, you can't. If you think the best method of self-defense is an operational 120mm smoothbore gun from a tank, you're not allowed to own the shells without ATF approval (and a $200 tax on each).

    I saw you mention "common-sense laws" earlier. Common sense dictates that mining your property or firing a 120mm explosive anti-personnel round at an intruder shouldn't be done.

    For the majority of Americans, common-sense also suggests that to own a firearm one should be properly trained, and licensed, similar to how one gets a license to drive a car.

    DaiTengu

    ... If little else, the brain is an educational toy.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ War Ensemble BBS - The sport is war, total war - warensemble.com
  • From Derision@VERT/AMIGAC to DaiTengu on Monday, July 16, 2018 21:28:39
    Re: Gun Grabbers
    By: DaiTengu to Thumper on Sat Jul 14 2018 10:33:03

    I saw you mention "common-sense laws" earlier. Common sense dictates that mining your property or firing a 120mm explosive anti-personnel round at an intruder shouldn't be done.

    For the majority of Americans, common-sense also suggests that to own a firearm one should be properly trained, and licensed, similar to how one gets a license to drive a car.

    This. I have no general problem with guns, but I don't see why you shouldn't need to have a license, registration, and maybe even insurance in the same way that you would a car. We make people do that to own a car so that we know that they have at least a marginal idea of how to operate it, and won't go driving on sidewalks mowing people down. In the same vein, I don't see why you shouldn't be properly trained and licensed to use any kind of a gun as well. Cos I'd much rather you understand how it works, than just be some schmo that walked off the street and bought a rifle from Wal-Mart with nothing except "guns are cool" as background.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Amiga City - The BBS for the Amiga - more than 2,500+ files
  • From JIMMYLOGAN@VERT/OTHETA to DERISION on Monday, August 06, 2018 23:44:00
    DERISION wrote to DAITENGU <=-

    I saw you mention "common-sense laws" earlier. Common sense dictates that mining your property or firing a 120mm explosive anti-personnel round at an intruder shouldn't be done.

    For the majority of Americans, common-sense also suggests that to own a firearm one should be properly trained, and licensed, similar to how one gets a license to drive a car.

    This. I have no general problem with guns, but I don't see why you shouldn't need to have a license, registration, and maybe even
    insurance in the same way that you would a car. We make people do that
    to own a car so that we know that they have at least a marginal idea of how to operate it, and won't go driving on sidewalks mowing people
    down. In the same vein, I don't see why you shouldn't be properly
    trained and licensed to use any kind of a gun as well. Cos I'd much
    rather you understand how it works, than just be some schmo that walked off the street and bought a rifle from Wal-Mart with nothing except
    "guns are cool" as background.

    In my area, people are basically brought up with or without guns. Those
    of us raised with guns were taught how to use, store, etc. Those without
    that kind of raising? Sure - they could use it. I know schools now teach driver's education - we didn't have that when I was in school, but I
    still took a test to get a driver's license.

    I did NOT take a test to own a gun, and I think the 2nd amendment allows
    me to OWN. I DID take a test and submitted myself to finger-printing
    and a background check to get a license to CARRY a gun on my person.




    ... Warning! Tagline thieves abound. See next message area for details!
    --- MultiMail/Darwin v0.49
    þ wcGATE 4.2 ÷ Omicron Theta * Southaven MS * winserver.org
  • From Thumper@VERT/THEWASTE to Derision on Thursday, September 13, 2018 15:53:54

    For the majority of Americans, common-sense also suggests that to own
    a
    firearm one should be properly trained, and licensed, similar to how
    one
    gets a license to drive a car.

    This. I have no general problem with guns, but I don't see why you
    shouldn't
    need to have a license, registration, and maybe even insurance in the
    same
    way that you would a car. We make people do that to own a car so that we know that they have at least a marginal idea of how to operate it, and
    won't
    go driving on sidewalks mowing people down. In the same vein, I don't
    see
    why you shouldn't be properly trained and licensed to use any kind of a
    gun
    as well. Cos I'd much rather you understand how it works, than just be
    some
    schmo that walked off the street and bought a rifle from Wal-Mart with nothing except "guns are cool" as background.

    The problem would be that criminals and killers would not bother to do any
    of that and as usual, the only ones that suffer and pay the "ginormous"
    fees for it are the legal, law-abiding citizens.

    -=Thumper=-
    Sysop
    The Wastelands BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ The Wastelands BBS, Copperopolis, CA
  • From danly@VERT/ALKY to Thumper on Sunday, November 18, 2018 14:05:00
    One of the nice side-effects of licensing and registration of firearms is
    that it quickly becomes evident just how gang-related violence dominates firearms fatalities. Here in Canada, the number of homicides by PAL-holders
    is approximately about as many women who are charged with infanticide; that
    is, it's statistically irrelevant. It makes for good argument data for
    firearms owners.

    However, that doesn't stop the Liberals and NDP from seeking to further make miserable the lives of PAL-holders or to deprive them of their property. When it comes to gang-related firearms violence our progressive politicians stick their fingers in their ears, close their eyes, and scream LALALALA.

    -D

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A39 2018/04/21 (Raspberry Pi/32)
    * Origin: Alcoholiday / Est. 1995 / alco.bbs.io