Kormos Kriszti n wrote to All <=-
@VIA: VERT/THEHELIC
@TZ: c1a4
Hi!
I'm happy to see an active board like this in 2017.
Hi!
I'm happy to see an active board like this in 2017.
Regards:
KormaX
---
� Synchronet � The Helicon BBS - http://heliconbbs.ddns.net
KORMOS KRISZTI N wrote to ALL <=-
@VIA: THEHELIC
@MSGID: <59DE6E3D.2973.dove-general@98.177.239.176>
Hi!
I'm happy to see an active board like this in 2017.
Regards:
KormaX
JIMMY ANDERSON wrote to KORMOS KRISZTI N <=-
KORMOS KRISZTI N wrote to ALL <=-
I'm happy to see an active board like this in 2017.
hey hey - active for sure :-) BBS ain't dead... yet...
Hi, just thought I might as well make a post introducing myself. Not really going to list anything about myself here, just that I don't usually use these, but they've always sort of fascinated me. I'll try to visit often, but IRL things might make it difficult.
On 07-24-19 22:54, Baguette wrote to All <=-
@VIA: VERT/CAVEBBS
Hi, just thought I might as well make a post introducing myself. Not really going to list anything about myself here, just that I don't
usually use these, but they've always sort of fascinated me. I'll try
to visit often, but IRL things might make it difficult.
On 07-24-19 22:54, Baguette wrote to All <=-
@VIA: VERT/CAVEBBS
Hi, just thought I might as well make a post introducing myself. Not really going to list anything about myself here, just that I don't usually use these, but they've always sort of fascinated me. I'll try to visit often, but IRL things might make it difficult.
Welcome aboard. :)
... Some men are discovered; others are found out.
It also turns out that my main PC doesn't support extended ASCII, so I'm mostly going to be connecting from this Samsung Q1 Ultra I forgot I had.
Thanks! Been spending most of today trying to figure out and memorize all the commands, since I don't want to keep having to check the help menus. It also turns out that my main PC doesn't support extended ASCII, so I'm mostly going to be connecting from this Samsung Q1 Ultra I forgot I had.
On 07-25-19 18:28, Baguette wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Thanks! Been spending most of today trying to figure out and memorize
all the commands, since I don't want to keep having to check the help menus. It also turns out that my main PC doesn't support extended
ASCII, so I'm mostly going to be connecting from this Samsung Q1 Ultra
I forgot I had.
Re: Re: Hi!
By: Baguette to Vk3jed on Thu Jul 25 2019 06:28 pm
It also turns out that my main PC doesn't support extended ASCII, so I' mostly going to be connecting from this Samsung Q1 Ultra I forgot I had
eh.. PCs have been able to support extended ASCII since at least the late 8 What kind of PC do you have? And OS?
Nightfox
I know I'll most likely be crucified for this, but it's running Windows 10. I know, it sucks, I just haven't been bothered to switch to someting more useable. The PC itself is custom-built, and I don't think I can remember most of the hardware names off the top of my head.
Anyway, I'm assuming it doesn't have extended ASCII because when I try to view the BBS on it, a lot of the fancy art doesn't display right if at all. I might just be missing something, I'll keep checking.
I know I'll most likely be crucified for this, but it's running Windows 10. I know, it sucks, I just haven't been bothered to switch to someting more useable. The PC itself is custom-built, and I don't think I can remember most of the hardware names off the top of my head.
Anyway, I'm assuming it doesn't have extended ASCII because when I try to view the BBS on it, a lot of the fancy art doesn't display right if at all. I might just be missing something, I'll keep checking.
Re: Re: Hi!
By: Baguette to Nightfox on Fri Jul 26 2019 09:24 am
I know I'll most likely be crucified for this, but it's running Windows 1 I know, it sucks, I just haven't been bothered to switch to someting more useable. The PC itself is custom-built, and I don't think I can remember most of the hardware names off the top of my head.
Anyway, I'm assuming it doesn't have extended ASCII because when I try to view the BBS on it, a lot of the fancy art doesn't display right if at al I might just be missing something, I'll keep checking.
Windows 10 and your PC isn't the problem. It sounds like you're just not usi http://wiki.synchro.net/resource:term
digital man
Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #60:
SCFG = Synchronet Configuration Utility
Norco, CA WX: 89.6øF, 37.0% humidity, 0 mph NNE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
---
þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
don't support displaying high-ASCII characters. What telnet/terminal client are you using? Some that I like are SyncTerm and NetRunner, and there was a
don't support displaying high-ASCII characters. What telnet/terminal
client are you using? Some that I like are SyncTerm and NetRunner,
and there was a
Agreed. NetRunner, Syncterm, and even the old Mtel32 works great.
Re: Re: Hi!
By: Zombie Mambo to Nightfox on Tue Jul 30 2019 10:29 am
don't support displaying high-ASCII characters. What telnet/terminal
client are you using? Some that I like are SyncTerm and NetRunner,
and there was a
Agreed. NetRunner, Syncterm, and even the old Mtel32 works great.
mtel32 was the one I was trying to think of. Those 3 are probably my favori for telnet BBS access.
When I got back into BBSing in 2007, another one I found was ZOC. It seemed work decently from what I remember, but it was shareware.
Nightfox
The thing i liked best about mtel and netrunner is they handle animated ansi well and have built in zmodem file xfers that actually work with your pc and bbs they way it used to be...
Syncterm was introduced to me long after so I already have my habits but it is equally a good terminal program.
Zombie Mambo wrote to Nightfox <=-ZM, .. what version of sycnterm you've been using?
Syncterm was introduced to me long after so I already have my habits
but it is equally a good terminal program.
The thing i liked best about mtel and netrunner is they handle animated ansi well and have built in zmodem file xfers that actually work with your pc and bbs they way it used to be...
On 08-02-19 12:03, Brokenmind wrote to Zombie Mambo <=-
I also really like how netrunner handles ansi but i also like synterm
also both are great clients
SyncTerm was one of the first telnet BBS terminals I used, and I stuck with it, as it does what I need. Also, it seems SyncTerm is noticeably a little faster at rendering ANSI than netrunner and mtel. I like that netrunner and metel look a little more like a traditional modem communication program though.
i have not noticed syncterm working faster than netrunner or mtelnet.
Re: Re: Hi!
By: MRO to Nightfox on Fri Aug 02 2019 10:53 pm
i have not noticed syncterm working faster than netrunner or mtelnet.
You keep saying that.
i have not noticed syncterm working faster than netrunner or
mtelnet.
You keep saying that.
yes, this is the 2nd time i replied to you about that.
maybe you have some computer issue? can you make a screen recording showing the difference? with windows 10 you can record the screen with the gamer bar.
personally , with one computer i had issues with synterm being slower due to it using the sdl
It's a matter of preference. Netrunner has the better display, but I prefer how SyncTerm works. Two things that make me choose SyncTerm over Netrunner
Re: Re: Hi!
By: MRO to nightfox on Sat Aug 03 2019 12:35 pm
i have not noticed syncterm working faster than netrunner or
mtelnet.
You keep saying that.
yes, this is the 2nd time i replied to you about that.
maybe you have some computer issue? can you make a screen recording showing the difference? with windows 10 you can record the screen with the gamer bar.
personally , with one computer i had issues with synterm being slower due to it using the sdl
For me, SyncTerm is faster than the others (not slower). I don't really consider it a big issue.
Re: Re: Hi!
By: Vk3jed to Brokenmind on Sat Aug 03 2019 11:36 am
It's a matter of preference. Netrunner has the better display, but I prefer how SyncTerm works. Two things that make me choose SyncTerm over Netrunner
I also found that Netrunner will automatically put you in RIP emulation if it gets the message from the BBS that it supports RIP. For some BBSs (like Particles), this causes problems because the Sysop didn't set up RIP on his BBS. And there was no way to disable this "feature" in Netrunner.
can you do a video comparing the two? why do you think syncterm is faster? shouldnt it atleast be the same as netrunner because they use sdl2?
I also found that Netrunner will automatically put you in RIP emulation if it gets the message from the BBS that it supports RIP. For some BBSs (like Particles), this causes problems because the Sysop didn't set up RIP on his BBS. And there was no way to disable this "feature" in Netrunner.
On 08-04-19 10:27, Dr. What wrote to Vk3jed <=-
@VIA: VERT/TWODUDES
Re: Re: Hi!
By: Vk3jed to Brokenmind on Sat Aug 03 2019 11:36 am
It's a matter of preference. Netrunner has the better display, but I prefer how SyncTerm works. Two things that make me choose SyncTerm over Netrunner
I also found that Netrunner will automatically put you in RIP emulation
if it gets the message from the BBS that it supports RIP. For some
BBSs (like Particles), this causes problems because the Sysop didn't
set up RIP on his BBS. And there was no way to disable this "feature"
in Netrunner.
I also found that Netrunner will automatically put you in RIP emulation
Interesting.. I didn't know NetRunner supported RIP.
I also found that Netrunner will automatically put you in RIP emulation if it gets the message from the BBS that it supports RIP. For some BBSs (like Particles), this causes problems because the Sysop didn't set up RIP on his
Re: Re: Hi!
By: MRO to Nightfox on Sun Aug 04 2019 02:47 pm
can you do a video comparing the two? why do you think syncterm is faster? shouldnt it atleast be the same as netrunner because they use sdl2?
I can just tell it's noticeably faster. I'm not sure I'd want to make a video right now, IMO it's just not that big of a deal to me. I haven't used NetRunner in a while either, so perhaps they're about the same.
I can just tell it's noticeably faster. I'm not sure I'd want to make
a video right now, IMO it's just not that big of a deal to me. I
haven't used NetRunner in a while either, so perhaps they're about the
same.
okay but it just takes 2 seconds to record a video.
you are saying some things about other products that might steer people away from them so atleast show some proof. you've also said it multiple times.
if someone said something you made was shit, wouldnt you want more info instead of vague comments? i dont know how you consider yourself a developer but behave like a stupid end user in this respect.
Re: Re: Hi!
By: MRO to Nightfox on Sun Aug 04 2019 09:19 pm
I can just tell it's noticeably faster. I'm not sure I'd want to make
a video right now, IMO it's just not that big of a deal to me. I
haven't used NetRunner in a while either, so perhaps they're about the
same.
okay but it just takes 2 seconds to record a video.
you are saying some things about other products that might steer people away from them so atleast show some proof. you've also said it multiple times.
I don't have any software installed to record screen video right now. I used to use Fraps for recording my screen, maybe I should install it again and
make a recording.
I don't have any software installed to record screen video right now. I use to use Fraps for recording my screen, maybe I should install it again and make a recording.
I wasn't talking down about the other term programs. I think NetRunner and mtel are both good.
make a recording.
I use and recommend OBS:
https://obsproject.com/
you can use windows 10's gaming bar
I think you're getting your terminal software mixed up Dr.What. Particles BBS is an old BBS that ran on a C-64. You're probably seeing "Commodore Graphics" known as CG Mode. Syncterm supports it so maybe you called Paritcles BBS with Syncterm? Netrunner only supports Ansi screens so seeing RIP screens with it is pretty much impossible. In fact Particles is on port 6400 which Netrunner does not support either. Of course it's possible to see anything when smoking some very potent weed. ;-)
I think you're getting your terminal software mixed up Dr.What.The Sysop even mentioned that the software he is using supports RIP, but he never set up the menus, so it's kinda hard to navigate in RIP mode.
Particles BBS is an old BBS that ran on a C-64. You're probably seeing
I think you're getting your terminal software mixed up Dr.What.
The Sysop even mentioned that the software he is using supports RIP, but he never set up the menus, so it's kinda hard to navigate in RIP mode.
Re: Re: Hi!
By: MRO to Digital Man on Mon Aug 05 2019 05:04 pm
you can use windows 10's gaming bar
I just had a quick look at that. It looks like it records the entire screen I'm not sure if there's a way to just record part of the screen if you want With Fraps, you could highlight just a part of the screen you wanted to reco to video. I'm using a 4K monitor at home now, and I'm not sure it would be ideal to capture the entire 4K screen for a video of a BBS telnet client (I
Nope. I use Linux and there are darn few programs that I can use to call BB Normally I use Syncterm just for simplicity, but I did try out Netrunner and the messages I got showed that Netrunner dectected RIP on Particles BBS.
Were there other BBS terminal programs that you tried that didn't handle zmo as well?
Zombie Mambo wrote to Nightfox <=-ZM, .. what version of sycnterm you've been using?
Syncterm was introduced to me long after so I already have my habits but it is equally a good terminal program.
Particles BBS runs on port 6400. Netrunner only supports port 23 so you couldn't have connected to Particles BBS with Netrunner anyway.
I just had a quick look at that. It looks like it records the entire
screen I'm not sure if there's a way to just record part of the screen
if you want With Fraps, you could highlight just a part of the screen
you wanted to reco to video. I'm using a 4K monitor at home now, and
I'm not sure it would be ideal to capture the entire 4K screen for a
video of a BBS telnet client (I
nope, you dont need to do the entire screen.
you should have tried it out.
Interesting that there hasn't been a new once created specifically for telnet BBS file transfers.
Netrunner supports all ports. bbsdomain.com:2400 etc
Netrunner supports all ports. bbsdomain.com:2400 etc
Can you tell me where I can change the port in Netrunners phone book?
HusTler wrote to Dr. What <=-
Particles BBS runs on port 6400. Netrunner only supports port
23 so you couldn't have connected to Particles BBS with Netrunner
anyway. ---
Particles BBS runs on port 6400. Netrunner only supports port 23 so you couldn't have connected to Particles BBS with Netrunner anyway.
Having things like zmodem and such over telnet seems somewhat redundant but it would be interesting to have one that was made just for that purpose.
Netrunner supports all ports. bbsdomain.com:2400 etc
Can you tell me where I can change the port in Netrunners phone book?
You seem very confused. A terminal app/dialer doesn't "support"
any ports.... It dials/connects the way you tell it to. Using
Netrunner (address book) you can just put in something like:
[0m[1m[30mRe[0m[1m[30m: [0m[0m[36mRe: Hi!
[0m[36m [1m[30mBy[0m[1m[30m: [0m[0m[36mDr. What [1m[30mto
[0m[36mHusTler [1m[30mon [0m[36mTue Aug 06 2019 01:22 pm[0m
[0m[36m
[0m[36m >> I think you're getting your terminal software mixed up Dr.What.
The Sysop even mentioned that the software he is using supports RIP, bu he never set up the menus, so it's kinda hard to navigate in RIP mode.
Particles BBS runs on port 6400. Netrunner only supports port 23 so you couldn't have connected to Particles BBS with Netrunner anyway.
Particles BBS runs on port 6400. Netrunner only supports port 23 so you couldn't have connected to Particles BBS with Netrunner anyway.
[0m[36m Im> Netrunner supports all ports. bbsdomain.com:2400 etc
Can you tell me where I can change the port in Netrunners phone book?
HusTler wrote to Gamgee <=-
Re: Re: Hi!
By: Gamgee
to HusTler on Tue Aug 06 2019
07:56 pm
You seem very confused. A terminal app/dialer doesn't "support"
any ports.... It dials/connects the way you tell it to. Using
Netrunner (address book) you can just put in something like:
It says Netrunner phone book on the bottom. I haven't dialed a
BBS over a phone line in over 12 years. Perhaps you are the one
confused??
HusTler wrote to Immortal <=-
Re: Re: Hi!
By: Immortal
to HusTler on Tue Aug 06 2019
04:59 pm
Netrunner supports all ports. bbsdomain.com:2400etc
Can you tell me where I can change the port in Netrunners phone
book?
this is incorrect... in netrunner, when you put in the address to connect to, if it is on a different port than the default, you simply add it to the domain with a colon...
I also found that Netrunner will automatically put you in RIP emulation if it gets the message from the BBS that it supports RIP. For some BBSs (like Particles), this causes problems because the Sysop didn't set up RIP on his BBS. And there was no way to disable this "feature" in Netrunner.---
You seem very confused. A terminal app/dialer doesn't "support"
Don't want to admit you don't know what you're doing?
[0m[1m[30mRe[0m[1m[30m: [0m[0m[36mRe: Hi!
[0m[36m [1m[30mBy[0m[1m[30m: [0m[0m[36mImmortal [1m[30mto [0m[36mHusTler [1m[30mon [0m[36mTue Aug 06 2019 04:59 pm[0m [0m[36m
[0m[36m Im> Netrunner supports all ports. bbsdomain.com:2400 etc
Can you tell me where I can change the port in Netrunners phone book?
this is incorrect... in netrunner, when you put in the address to connect
to, if it is on a different port than the default, you simply add it to the domain with a colon...
Thanks for that. I've used Qodem and Syncterm for years and both have a seperate port setting field. Thanks for sharing your knowledge.
That said Netruner does not support Rip which is was what started this thread.
[0m[1m[30mRe[0m[1m[30m: [0m[0m[36mRe: Hi!
[0m[36m [1m[30mBy[0m[1m[30m: [0m[0m[36mImmortal [1m[30mto [0m[36mHusTler [1m[30mon [0m[36mTue Aug 06 2019 04:59 pm[0m [0m[36m
[0m[36m Im> Netrunner supports all ports. bbsdomain.com:2400 etc
I'm not sure why, but it seems all of your messages lately have ANSI codes in the first few lines that show the subject, from, and to. It seems my message reader is having a hard time dealing with it, because it messes up
the rest of the message.. Do you have ANSI codes enabled in your sub-board settings in SCFG?
I'm not sure why, but it seems all of your messages lately have ANSI
codes in the first few lines that show the subject, from, and to. It
seems my message reader is having a hard time dealing with it, because
it messes up the rest of the message.. Do you have ANSI codes enabled
in your sub-board settings in SCFG?
so THAT's why everything comes out in that cruddy dark cyan and doesn't change back when writing a new message... at least not until some other code is run which resets the colors... damned annoying at times :P
Thanks for that. I've used Qodem and Syncterm for years and both have a seperate port setting field. Thanks for sharing your knowledge. That said Netruner does not support Rip which is was what started this thread.
Re: Re: Hi!
By: HusTler to Immortal on Tue Aug 06 2019 08:00 pm
[0m[1m[30mRe[0m[1m[30m: [0m[0m[36mRe: Hi!
[0m[36m [1m[30mBy[0m[1m[30m: [0m[0m[36mImmortal [1m[30mto [0m[36mHusTle [1m[30mon [0m[36mTue Aug 06 2019 04:59 pm[0m [0m[36m
[0m[36m Im> Netrunner supports all ports. bbsdomain.com:2400 etc
Can you tell me where I can change the port in Netrunners phone book?
I'm not sure why, but it seems all of your messages lately have ANSI codes i the first few lines that show the subject, from, and to. It seems my messag reader is having a hard time dealing with it, because it messes up the rest the message.. Do you have ANSI codes enabled in your sub-board settings in SCFG?
so THAT's why everything comes out in that cruddy dark cyan and doesn't chan back when writing a new message... at least not until some other code is run which resets the colors... damned annoying at times :P
This seems to be something different, and more recent than the cyan coloring With the cyan colored messages, I think they were just using a Synchronet co code. These messages actually have ANSI codes in them, and (at least with m reader) are screwing with the message so that the message is pretty much unreadable.. I think these ANSI codes might have some kind of cursor moveme or animation codes that are messing with how the message is displayed.
Re: Re: Hi!
By: Nightfox to MRO on Mon Aug 05 2019 10:14 am
Re: Re: Hi!
By: MRO to Nightfox on Sun Aug 04 2019 09:19 pm
I can just tell it's noticeably faster. I'm not sure I'd want to mak
a video right now, IMO it's just not that big of a deal to me. I
haven't used NetRunner in a while either, so perhaps they're about th
same.
okay but it just takes 2 seconds to record a video.
you are saying some things about other products that might steer peo away from them so atleast show some proof. you've also said it multi times.
I don't have any software installed to record screen video right now. I used to use Fraps for recording my screen, maybe I should install it agai and
make a recording.
I use and recommend OBS:
https://obsproject.com/
digital man
Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #31:
FTP = File Transfer Protocol
Norco, CA WX: 95.4øF, 23.0% humidity, 5 mph ENE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
you said slower, and people dont like slower
Re: Re: Hi!
By: Zombie Mambo to Nightfox on Tue Aug 06 2019 04:45 pm
Interesting that there hasn't been a new once created specifically for telnet BBS file transfers.
Well with the internet, you can use FTP to transfer files from a BBS if you
Nightfox
Re: Re: Hi!
By: HusTler to Dr. What on Tue Aug 06 2019 04:47 pm
Particles BBS runs on port 6400. Netrunner only supports port 23 so you couldn't have connected to Particles BBS with Netrunner anyway.
Wrong! I use Netrunner and it support's all BBS ports
I use it to connect to my Raspberry Pi BBS on port 2300 razzpie.ddns.net:2300
Zombie Mambo wrote to Bbsing.Bbs <=-
Re: Re: Hi!
By: Bbsing.Bbs to Zombie Mambo on Thu Aug 01 2019 09:39 pm
Zombie Mambo wrote to Nightfox <=-ZM, .. what version of sycnterm you've been using?
Syncterm was introduced to me long after so I already have my habits but it is equally a good terminal program.
I haven't used it in a long time. 2 yrs maybe.yeah it was perfect on a windows system. I'm going to test in a few days on a linux system. That was where i had issues in the past.
I can't recall but I think it came with the last version of Synchronet that I update to. I really don't remember.
I just remember being impressed that the ANSI rendering was spot on.
MRO wrote to Nightfox <=-
Re: Re: Hi!
By: Nightfox to MRO on Mon Aug 05 2019 10:14 am
I don't have any software installed to record screen video right now. I use to use Fraps for recording my screen, maybe I should install it again and make a recording.
i told you how with windows.
I know there's all sorts of ways but for the nostalgia purposes it's cool to watch zmodem file transfers zip by and get the pop file xfer windows within the same terminal app...
also an opportunity to have an option to strip ansi as well as ctrl+a codes in the qwk settings
displays fine on my end. maybe it's an opportunity to modify your msg reader software.
Re: Re: Hi!
By: MRO to Rampage on Wed Aug 07 2019 04:05 pm
also an opportunity to have an option to strip ansi as well as ctrl+a codes in the qwk settings
I thought SCFG already had options for stripping ANSI and other color codes in there. I was looking for that in the sub-board settings earlier; maybe I should have been looking in the QWK hub settings.
Back in the day, I also liked configuring external 3rd-party protocols (such as BiModem, Puma/MPT, etc.). I configured them both for my terminal software and my BBS so users could use them. And because they were external, they'd have to launch an external program and wouldn't display within the terminal app.. But it was cool to watch.
Re: Re: Hi!
By: MRO to Nightfox on Mon Aug 05 2019 05:03 pm
you said slower, and people dont like slower
I heard your girlfriend likes it slower and lower...
Really? We can use FTP with the internet?
F*ck
:)
i told you how with windows.
Easy to do, also you can use problem steps recorder. The long lost troubleshooting tool.
on the keyboard press the windows key (or click start, and type run)
in the run field type:
You seem very confused. A terminal app/dialer doesn't "support"
any ports.... It dials/connects the way you tell it to. Using
Netrunner (address book) you can just put in something like:
bbs.whatever.net:24
I know there's all sorts of ways but for the nostalgia purposes it's cool to watch
zmodem
file transfers zip by and get the pop file xfer windows within the same terminal
app...
Re: Re: Hi!
By: HusTler to Rampage on Wed Aug 07 2019 09:41 am
Thanks for that. I've used Qodem and Syncterm for years and both have a seperate port setting field. Thanks for sharing your knowledge. That said Netruner does not support Rip which is was what started this thread.
rip sucks anyways, usually. i think i've only seen one cool rip bbs in my lifetime.
i have not noticed syncterm working faster than netrunner or
mtelnet.
can you do a video comparing the two? why do you think syncterm is faster? shouldnt it atleast be the same as netrunner because they use sdl2?
I recently built a new PC, and on my new PC, any difference in speed between SyncTerm, NetRunner, or mTelnet is hardly (if at all) noticeable to me. On older PCs though, I seem to remember noticing a slight difference in speed.
I recently built a new PC, and on my new PC, any difference in speed
between SyncTerm, NetRunner, or mTelnet is hardly (if at all)
noticeable to me. On older PCs though, I seem to remember noticing a
slight difference in speed.
i bet you it was some weird videocard performance bottleneck.
BBSing for me is removing myself from the endless gourmet of the internet - I want to stay within the BBS using BBS technologies, not go off and load up my browser and go to some FTP site - only to see my bookmarks and the 'F' of FTP bring up Facebook as a URL suggestion!
I use FTP as part of an updated suite of tools. With Synchronet, I can ftp QWK packets
to
my DOSBOX, where I run an instance of MultiMail and Qedit, just like I used to use
back
in the 90s. When I'm done, I close DOSBOX and use FTP to upload the .rep packet to the
BBS.
MRO wrote to Bbsing.Bbs <=-
Re: Re: Hi!
By: Bbsing.Bbs to MRO on Wed Aug 07 2019 01:56 pm
i told you how with windows.
Easy to do, also you can use problem steps recorder. The long lost troubleshooting tool.
on the keyboard press the windows key (or click start, and type run)
in the run field type:
this looks like a great program. i never knew about it. i dont think
it records video.
i'm certainly going to use it next time someone tells me "it doesn't
work" ---
Rampage wrote to Nightfox <=-[0m[36mHusTler
Re: Re: Hi!
By: Nightfox to HusTler on Wed Aug 07 2019 09:33:24
[0m[1m[30mRe[0m[1m[30m: [0m[0m[36mRe: Hi!
[0m[36m [1m[30mBy[0m[1m[30m: [0m[0m[36mImmortal [1m[30mto
[1m[30mon [0m[36mTue Aug 06 2019 04:59 pm[0m [0m[36min
[0m[36m Im> Netrunner supports all ports. bbsdomain.com:2400 etc
[trim]
I'm not sure why, but it seems all of your messages lately have ANSI codes
the first few lines that show the subject, from, and to. It seems my message reader is having a hard time dealing with it, because it messess
up
the rest of the message.. Do you have ANSI codes enabled in your sub-board
ettings in SCFG?
so THAT's why everything comes out in that cruddy dark cyan and doesn't change back when writing a new message... at least not until some other code is run which resets the colors... damned annoying at times :P
so THAT's why everything comes out in that cruddy dark cyan and doesn't change back when writing a new message... at least not until some other code is run which resets the colors... damned annoying at times :P
I use multimail and that seems to work pretty well. .. accept for decoding what's above.
multimail if offline messaging... i'm actually attempting to use the BBS experiance unlike my past several decades of using only a sysop editor to access the message bases from outside of the BBS ;)
On 08-13-19 12:23, Nightfox wrote to Rampage <=-
When I see "sysop editor", I think it's something that edits the
sysop..? Then I see you mean a message editor for the sysop. :P
| Sysop: | MCMLXXIX |
|---|---|
| Location: | Prospect, CT |
| Users: | 333 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 88:53:22 |
| Calls: | 593 |
| Messages: | 241585 |