I suppose I wasn't quite specific enough lol.. I purposely use the smallest client I can. SyncTerm sounds great but it seems as though it is meant to
be run through a web browser. I use telnet.. and when it works I use PuTTy a interface. The main reason being that I get 200Mb per month on my cellular plan and I tether it to my PC as my only internet connection. Sad I know. I'm considering getting dial-up if it still exists and if I can get it under $xx.xx/mnth. Basically I am moving away from graphical interfaces as much as humanly possible. i use tty when I can, but there are certain situations when I just can't render information reliabley to FrameBuffer.
I do thank you all very much though for pointing me in the right direction :) When I am not worried about data usage I will definitely take a look at the firefox program

Thanks, Again,
Spin

---
þ Synchronet þ lokisdenbbs.com

I suppose I wasn't quite specific enough lol.. I purposely use the smallest client I can. SyncTerm sounds great but it seems as though it is meant to be run through a web browser.

SyncTerm is a stand-alone desktop program. It doesn't run through a web browser.. Perhaps you're thinking of fTelnet/HTMLTerm?

Nightfox

---
þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion BBS - digitaldistortionbbs.com

Re: Syncterm
By: Spin to All on Thu Apr 09 2015 12:35:44

I suppose I wasn't quite specific enough lol.. I purposely use the smallest client I can. SyncTerm sounds great but it seems as though it is meant to be run through a web browser. I use telnet.. and when it works I use PuTTy a interface. The main reason being that I get 200Mb per month on

Syncterm is stand alone, not browser based. It's small, quick, and efficient. If you like Putty You'll love syncterm.
---------------
Kostie Muirhead
AKA Underminer
The Undermine - undermine.ddns.net
Fido: 1:342/17


---
þ Synchronet þ The Undermine - undermine.ddns.net

Re: Syncterm
By: Spin to All on Thu Apr 09 2015 12:35 pm

I suppose I wasn't quite specific enough lol.. I purposely use the smallest client I can. SyncTerm sounds great but it seems as though it is meant to
be run through a web browser. I use telnet.. and when it works I use PuTTy
a interface. The main reason being that I get 200Mb per month on my
cellular plan and I tether it to my PC as my only internet connection. Sad
I know. I'm considering getting dial-up if it still exists and if I can get it under $xx.xx/mnth. Basically I am moving away from graphical interfaces as much as humanly possible. i use tty when I can, but there are certain situations when I just can't render information reliabley to FrameBuffer.
I do thank you all very much though for pointing me in the right direction :) When I am not worried about data usage I will definitely take a look at the firefox program

Thanks, Again,

i dont think you understand what we were saying about clients.

anyways, what is your location and situation for it to be like this for you? are you in a isolated area or on a very small budget?
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Syncterm
By: Spin to All on Thu Apr 09 2015 12:35 pm

I suppose I wasn't quite specific enough lol.. I purposely use the smallest client I can. SyncTerm sounds great but it seems as though it is meant to be run through a web browser.

It is not. How did you get that impression? I would like to fix whatever makes people think that.


---
http://DuckDuckGo.com/ a better search engine that respects your privacy.
þ Synchronet þ My Brand-New BBS (All the cool SysOps run STOCK!)