Any other Whovians get to see the latest Doctor Who? This last one completely blew me away. Looks like we're in for another big twist!
john Hurt!
already figured otut where he is in the "Doctor" line and it is not
--- DRIBBLE wrote --^G> Re: Dr. Wh
By: Dreamer to
Any other Whovians get to see the latest Doctor Who? This last on completely blew me away. Looks like we're in for another big twist
Yeah, I am soooo annoyed that I have to wait all the way till november to the conclusion, on the bright side well have David tennant in the next epi
as well :) should be interesting watching matt smith interract with him
-Dribble {lunatic.zapto.org
0
--
Synchronet Lunatic Fringe - lunatic.zapto.or
--- The Student wrote --
--- DRIBBLE wrote --^G> Re:
By: Dreamer to
Any other Whovians get to see the latest Doctor Who? This last o completely blew me away. Looks like we're in for another big twis
Yeah, I am soooo annoyed that I have to wait all the way till november t the conclusion, on the bright side well have David tennant in the next e
as well :) should be interesting watching matt smith interract with hi
-Dribble {lunatic.zapto.or
-
Synchronet Lunatic Fringe - lunatic.zapto.o
--
"You can always judge a man by the quality of his enemies!" -Seve
--- DRIBBLE wrote --^G> Re: 0
By: Dreamer
Any other Whovians get to see the latest Doctor Who? This last completely blew me away. Looks like we're in for another big twi
Yeah, I am soooo annoyed that I have to wait all the way till november the conclusion, on the bright side well have David tennant in the next
as well :) should be interesting watching matt smith interract with h
-Dribble {lunatic.zapto.o
Synchronet Lunatic Fringe - lunatic.zapto.
Re: Dr. Who
By: Dreamer to All on Mon May 20 2013 07:53 pm
Any other Whovians get to see the latest Doctor Who? This last one completely blew me away. Looks like we're in for another big twist!
Yeah, I am soooo annoyed that I have to wait all the way till november to se the conclusion, on the bright side well have David tennant in the next episo as well :) should be interesting watching matt smith interract with him.
-Dribble {lunatic.zapto.org}
--- DREAMER wrote --
Any other Whovians get to see the latest Doctor Who? This last on
completely blew me away. Looks like we're in for another big twist
--- DRIBBLE wrote --
what bothers me about this is a few things, #1 this would make matt smith last doctor as there can only be 12, and #2 they have shown all his pas incarnations now in his timeline but if its his entire life it should of s his future incarnations as well, unless he doesn't have any
--- The Student wrote --
Sorry, seems my last two messages went wonky. Anywho, regarding the John H incarnation. I don't seem him as an 8.5 or "True Nine" incarnation so much
a potential amalgamation or Valeyard type Doctor. With that said, November not get here quickly enough
The Student wrote to The Student <=-
Sorry, seems my last two messages went wonky. Anywho, regarding the
John Hurt incarnation. I don't seem him as an 8.5 or "True Nine" incarnation so much as a potential amalgamation or Valeyard type
Doctor. With that said, November can not get here quickly enough.
Absolutely. I really enjoyed that one, although if what I think is going
on is going on, it's a bit of a shaft to Paul McGann...
As long as the BBC wants to keep producing their highly thought of and highly rated drama, I'm sure they will think of a way around that. I can think of several... the most obvious is River Song saving The Doctor by giving him her remaining regenerations.
I read somewhere that the current series has the Doctor as saying he's got 705 regenerations. I need to go back and find that, and look at the source. (could be 507, been a few days)
Of course, I've got this nagging thought in the back of my mind that somewhere in the old series Gallifrey had something to do with the number of regenerations. It could very well be that with the Time War they increased their regenerative capabilities. Perhaps the Doctor has been left with an inordinately high number of regens.
--- DREAMER wrote --
I doubt it's going to be that. Paul McGann has actually been quite active Doctor Who via audio books. I'm certain if it was going to be his iterati screen, they would have asked him (and I'm sure he'd accept)
It's a wonder they haven't aired him yet
--- the doctor wrote -- >
--- DREAMER wrote -
I doubt it's going to be that. Paul McGann has actually been quite acti Doctor Who via audio books. I'm certain if it was going to be his itera screen, they would have asked him (and I'm sure he'd accept
It's a wonder they haven't aired him ye
I didn't mean they were going to have John Hurt be *his* Doctor, I meant t instead of using his Doctor to be the one who ended the time war, they've created another
I can understand the dramatic reasons for wanting to do that, however, it seems to me that as they asked Eccelston back, they probably wanted to hav three Doctor show.
I'm sure it will be good, in any case... I don't think that Moffat is into inviting old actors back idea
Re: Dr. Who
By: Nonya to Dreamer on Tue May 21 2013 01:11 pm
john Hurt!what bothers me about this is a few things, #1 this would make matt smith the last doctor as there can only be 12, and #2 they have shown all his past incarnations now in his timeline but if its his entire life it should of showed his future incarnations as well, unless he doesn't have any.
Android8675 wrote to Dribble <=-
Did you notice that the dead Tardis had the same window crack as Matt Smith's Tardis when they crash landed on Trenselor?
I suspect Matt is Dr. #12, but somehow I doubt he'll be the last
Doctor, but hey 50 years is a good run for a series, They should just
pull a Star Trek and reboot the series. It is time travel after all, what's not possible? --
Sysop: | MCMLXXIX |
---|---|
Location: | Prospect, CT |
Users: | 333 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 221:14:11 |
Calls: | 576 |
Messages: | 236311 |