So.... The Supreme Court won't entertain the idea that the election was stolen in Pennsylvania. This decison makes it next to impossible for Trump to prevail in his bid to overturn the election.
I've been saying since the election that there was a very simple way for everyone to know with certainty whether there were any shenanigans going on with the election, and that was to watch the Supreme Court.
Why have I been saying this? Because 6 of the 9 justices are conservative, and 3 of those were appointed by Trump himself. If there was sufficient fraud to overturn this election, the Supreme Court would have dealt with it. We know from precedent (Bush/Gore 2000) that they'll get involved if need be.
Even though the court leans so heavily to the right, I fully expected them to not touch this.
Why? Because the only real fraud is the claims of fraud. The only one really trying to steal the election is Trump. I know many of his supporters wish it weren't so... but wishing don't make reality.
Anyone agree or disagree?
-Hobo
Al wrote to Arelor <=-
If you are talking about left organizations sponsoring groups that riot and vandalize in order to bring unstability against society and the federal government, then I agree it sucks and that burning the streets is highly divisive behaviour.
The left does not sponsor groups or rioting.
Re: Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
By: Gamgee to Al on Thu Dec 10 2020 09:35 pm
The left does not sponsor groups or rioting.
Haha! Good one!
Wrong, but funny.
Wrong, how?
The left does not sponsor groups or rioting.
Wrong, but funny.
Wrong, how?
Someone enjoys being coy.
Vlk-451 wrote to Gamgee <=-
Al wrote to Arelor <=-
If you are talking about left organizations sponsoring groups that riot and vandalize in order to bring unstability against society and the federal government, then I agree it sucks and that burning the streets is highly divisive behaviour.
The left does not sponsor groups or rioting.
Ummm. Social Justics courses, human resources, the ADL, other
Provda outlets that churn out regressive and inflamed articles?
Hello?
Gamer?
Vlk-451 wrote to Gamgee <=-
Al wrote to Arelor <=-
If you are talking about left organizations sponsoring groups that riot and vandalize in order to bring unstability against society and the federal government, then I agree it sucks and that burning the streets is highly divisive behaviour.
The left does not sponsor groups or rioting.
Ummm. Social Justics courses, human resources, the ADL, other
Provda outlets that churn out regressive and inflamed articles?
Hello?
Gamer?
Hello? Gamer? Learn how to read/post, wouldja? The text above that
you quoted was a conversation between "Al" and "Arelor", and I wrote
none of that. Not sure why you replied to me. Please try harder.
Re: Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
By: Vlk-451 to Al on Mon Dec 28 2020 01:55 am
The left does not sponsor groups or rioting.
Wrong, but funny.
Wrong, how?
Someone enjoys being coy.
Just being real. Someone or group may be protesting or rioting, but it is not the left.
Ttyl :-),
Al
I think it has more to do with everyone involved not wanting to be anywhere near this. It's about keeping the peace over political allegiances.
Just being real. Someone or group may be protesting or rioting, but it
is not the left.
That's seemingly an argument of semantics to most people.
Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
By: Vlk-451 to Hobo on Mon Dec 28 2020 01:50:58
I think it has more to do with everyone involved not wanting to be anywhere near this. It's about keeping the peace over political allegiances.
You think it's that simple? There is no "Keeping The Peace" when a 3 year old narcisist tyrant goes on a rampage. Shit's gonna get flung about. The harder you try to "keep the peace" the worse it gets.
-Hobo
bbs.mystic.dog Building World Peace thru Global War bbs.mystic.dog .
Re: Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
By: Vlk-451 to Al on Mon Dec 28 2020 04:01 pm
Just being real. Someone or group may be protesting or rioting, but it
is not the left.
That's seemingly an argument of semantics to most people.
It's not semantic at all. There is a problem behind the protests and riots that follow, but that is not the left.
Ttyl :-),
Al
It's not semantic at all. There is a problem behind the protests and
riots that follow, but that is not the left.
Because you're the arbiter of what is and isn't "The Left"?
Are we talking about the authoritarian left or the liberal left? Surely the people involved in the riots and protests over these non-descript problems surely share some leftist ideology.
To someone like me, it is semantics, because while I agree with your general notion, your tone and way of leading the argument reaks of "No it's actually this way because I'm better then you and my farts smell awesome. Wana sniff?"
Vlk-451 wrote to Gamgee <=-
Al wrote to Arelor <=-
If you are talking about left organizations sponsoring groups that riot and vandalize in order to bring unstability against society and the federal government, then I agree it sucks and that burning the streets is highly divisive behaviour.
The left does not sponsor groups or rioting.
Ummm. Social Justics courses, human resources, the ADL, other
Provda outlets that churn out regressive and inflamed articles?
Hello?
Gamer?
Hello? Gamer? Learn how to read/post, wouldja? The text above that
you quoted was a conversation between "Al" and "Arelor", and I wrote
none of that. Not sure why you replied to me. Please try harder.
I was intending to reply to Al and Arelor, I used one of your
posts to quote them, forgot to change the names away from you to
one of them, simple and honest mistake from posting too quickly.
I'm sure you've made that mistake before at least once in your
life, so in that instance I would hope you understand.
Vlk-451 wrote to Gamgee <=-
Al wrote to Arelor <=-
If you are talking about left organizations sponsoring groups that riot and vandalize in order to bring unstability against society and the federal government, then I agree it sucks and that burning the streets is highly divisive behaviour.
The left does not sponsor groups or rioting.
Ummm. Social Justics courses, human resources, the ADL, other
Provda outlets that churn out regressive and inflamed articles?
Hello?
Gamer?
Hello? Gamer? Learn how to read/post, wouldja? The text above that
you quoted was a conversation between "Al" and "Arelor", and I wrote
none of that. Not sure why you replied to me. Please try harder.
I was intending to reply to Al and Arelor, I used one of your
posts to quote them, forgot to change the names away from you to
one of them, simple and honest mistake from posting too quickly.
Why would you use my post and then need to remember to change the
names? You replied to what "Al" posted, so just reply to his message
and there's no need to change names. Simple, huh?
I'm sure you've made that mistake before at least once in your
life, so in that instance I would hope you understand.
Actually, no, I have never made that mistake, so there is no "that instance". Good try, though. Well, mediocre try, anyway.
... He does the work of 3 Men...Moe, Larry & Curly
Sysop: | MCMLXXIX |
---|---|
Location: | Prospect, CT |
Users: | 325 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 140:49:03 |
Calls: | 502 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Messages: | 218445 |