• Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit

    From Vlk-451@VERT/INREALM to Hobo on Monday, December 28, 2020 01:50:58
    Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
    By: Hobo to All on Wed Dec 09 2020 11:53 am

    So.... The Supreme Court won't entertain the idea that the election was stolen in Pennsylvania. This decison makes it next to impossible for Trump to prevail in his bid to overturn the election.

    I've been saying since the election that there was a very simple way for everyone to know with certainty whether there were any shenanigans going on with the election, and that was to watch the Supreme Court.

    Why have I been saying this? Because 6 of the 9 justices are conservative, and 3 of those were appointed by Trump himself. If there was sufficient fraud to overturn this election, the Supreme Court would have dealt with it. We know from precedent (Bush/Gore 2000) that they'll get involved if need be.

    Even though the court leans so heavily to the right, I fully expected them to not touch this.

    Why? Because the only real fraud is the claims of fraud. The only one really trying to steal the election is Trump. I know many of his supporters wish it weren't so... but wishing don't make reality.

    Anyone agree or disagree?

    -Hobo

    I think it has more to do with everyone involved not wanting to be anywhere near this. It's about keeping the peace over political allegiances.

    þ Crystal Palace, Orbitsville þ

    ---
    þ Posted via InnerRealmBBS þ
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Inner Realm BBS - Charlotte, NC - innerrealmbbs.us
  • From Vlk-451@VERT/INREALM to Gamgee on Monday, December 28, 2020 01:55:21
    Re: Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
    By: Gamgee to Al on Fri Dec 11 2020 02:35 am

    Al wrote to Arelor <=-

    If you are talking about left organizations sponsoring groups that riot and vandalize in order to bring unstability against society and the federal government, then I agree it sucks and that burning the streets is highly divisive behaviour.

    The left does not sponsor groups or rioting.

    Ummm. Social Justics courses, human resources, the ADL, other Provda outlets that churn out regressive and inflamed articles?

    Hello?

    Gamer?

    þ Crystal Palace, Orbitsville þ

    ---
    þ Posted via InnerRealmBBS þ
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Inner Realm BBS - Charlotte, NC - innerrealmbbs.us
  • From Vlk-451@VERT/INREALM to Al on Monday, December 28, 2020 01:55:52
    Re: Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
    By: Al to Gamgee on Fri Dec 11 2020 03:08 am

    Re: Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
    By: Gamgee to Al on Thu Dec 10 2020 09:35 pm

    The left does not sponsor groups or rioting.

    Haha! Good one!


    Wrong, but funny.

    Wrong, how?

    Someone enjoys being coy.

    þ Crystal Palace, Orbitsville þ

    ---
    þ Posted via InnerRealmBBS þ
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Inner Realm BBS - Charlotte, NC - innerrealmbbs.us
  • From Al@VERT/TRMB to Vlk-451 on Sunday, December 27, 2020 20:04:45
    Re: Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
    By: Vlk-451 to Al on Mon Dec 28 2020 01:55 am

    The left does not sponsor groups or rioting.

    Wrong, but funny.

    Wrong, how?

    Someone enjoys being coy.

    Just being real. Someone or group may be protesting or rioting, but it is not the left.

    Ttyl :-),
    Al

    ... I may not be perfect, but parts of me are excellent.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada
  • From Gamgee@VERT/PALANT to Vlk-451 on Monday, December 28, 2020 07:30:00
    Vlk-451 wrote to Gamgee <=-

    Al wrote to Arelor <=-

    If you are talking about left organizations sponsoring groups that riot and vandalize in order to bring unstability against society and the federal government, then I agree it sucks and that burning the streets is highly divisive behaviour.

    The left does not sponsor groups or rioting.

    Ummm. Social Justics courses, human resources, the ADL, other
    Provda outlets that churn out regressive and inflamed articles?

    Hello?

    Gamer?

    Hello? Gamer? Learn how to read/post, wouldja? The text above that
    you quoted was a conversation between "Al" and "Arelor", and I wrote
    none of that. Not sure why you replied to me. Please try harder.



    ... Ignorance can be cured. Stupid is forever.
    --- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
  • From Vlk-451@VERT/THEWASTE to Gamgee on Monday, December 28, 2020 08:14:55
    Re: Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
    By: Gamgee to Vlk-451 on Mon Dec 28 2020 07:30 am

    Vlk-451 wrote to Gamgee <=-

    Al wrote to Arelor <=-

    If you are talking about left organizations sponsoring groups that riot and vandalize in order to bring unstability against society and the federal government, then I agree it sucks and that burning the streets is highly divisive behaviour.

    The left does not sponsor groups or rioting.

    Ummm. Social Justics courses, human resources, the ADL, other
    Provda outlets that churn out regressive and inflamed articles?

    Hello?

    Gamer?

    Hello? Gamer? Learn how to read/post, wouldja? The text above that
    you quoted was a conversation between "Al" and "Arelor", and I wrote
    none of that. Not sure why you replied to me. Please try harder.

    I was intending to reply to Al and Arelor, I used one of your posts to quote them, forgot to change the names away from you to one of them, simple and honest mistake from posting too quickly.

    I'm sure you've made that mistake before at least once in your life, so in that instance I would hope you understand.

    Gamer? My mom is trying to use the modem, I think the connection is br#@$2in% #p. H&6lo?

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ -=The Wastelands BBS=- -=Since 1990=-
  • From Vlk-451@VERT/INREALM to Al on Monday, December 28, 2020 16:01:06
    Re: Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
    By: Al to Vlk-451 on Sun Dec 27 2020 08:04 pm

    Re: Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
    By: Vlk-451 to Al on Mon Dec 28 2020 01:55 am

    The left does not sponsor groups or rioting.

    Wrong, but funny.

    Wrong, how?

    Someone enjoys being coy.

    Just being real. Someone or group may be protesting or rioting, but it is not the left.

    Ttyl :-),
    Al

    That's seemingly an argument of semantics to most people.

    þ Crystal Palace, Orbitsville þ

    ---
    þ Posted via InnerRealmBBS þ
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Inner Realm BBS - Charlotte, NC - innerrealmbbs.us
  • From Hobo@VERT/MYSTIDOG to Vlk-451 on Monday, December 28, 2020 19:49:42
    Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
    By: Vlk-451 to Hobo on Mon Dec 28 2020 01:50:58

    I think it has more to do with everyone involved not wanting to be anywhere near this. It's about keeping the peace over political allegiances.

    You think it's that simple? There is no "Keeping The Peace" when a 3 year old narcisist tyrant goes on a rampage. Shit's gonna get flung about. The harder you try to "keep the peace" the worse it gets.

    -Hobo


    bbs.mystic.dog Building World Peace thru Global War bbs.mystic.dog .

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Looking for Global War players! bbs.mystic.dog
  • From Al@VERT/TRMB to Vlk-451 on Monday, December 28, 2020 15:36:41
    Re: Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
    By: Vlk-451 to Al on Mon Dec 28 2020 04:01 pm

    Just being real. Someone or group may be protesting or rioting, but it
    is not the left.

    That's seemingly an argument of semantics to most people.

    It's not semantic at all. There is a problem behind the protests and riots that follow, but that is not the left.

    Ttyl :-),
    Al

    ... A camel is a horse planned by committee.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada
  • From Vlk-451@VERT/INREALM to Hobo on Tuesday, December 29, 2020 01:12:58
    Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
    By: Hobo to Vlk-451 on Mon Dec 28 2020 07:49 pm

    Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
    By: Vlk-451 to Hobo on Mon Dec 28 2020 01:50:58

    I think it has more to do with everyone involved not wanting to be anywhere near this. It's about keeping the peace over political allegiances.

    You think it's that simple? There is no "Keeping The Peace" when a 3 year old narcisist tyrant goes on a rampage. Shit's gonna get flung about. The harder you try to "keep the peace" the worse it gets.

    -Hobo


    bbs.mystic.dog Building World Peace thru Global War bbs.mystic.dog .

    As a former fed, yeah. That's all I saw. People covering their asses.

    þ Crystal Palace, Orbitsville þ

    ---
    þ Posted via InnerRealmBBS þ
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Inner Realm BBS - Charlotte, NC - innerrealmbbs.us
  • From Vlk-451@VERT/INREALM to Al on Tuesday, December 29, 2020 01:19:36
    Re: Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
    By: Al to Vlk-451 on Mon Dec 28 2020 03:36 pm

    Re: Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
    By: Vlk-451 to Al on Mon Dec 28 2020 04:01 pm

    Just being real. Someone or group may be protesting or rioting, but it
    is not the left.

    That's seemingly an argument of semantics to most people.

    It's not semantic at all. There is a problem behind the protests and riots that follow, but that is not the left.

    Ttyl :-),
    Al

    Because you're the arbiter of what is and isn't "The Left"?

    Are we talking about the authoritarian left or the liberal left? Surely the people involved in the riots and protests over these non-descript problems surely share some leftist ideology.

    This is the exact shit enlightened leftists like yourself pulled with that entire GamerGate debackle bck in 2015. Shift the narrative, redefine the terms, dissociate with all radical elements while painting your political rivals as nothing but extremeists.

    It's not healthy to the ability for either side to communicate effectively and by trying to win some sort of ideological argument you aren't actally reaching me with your points.

    To someone like me, it is semantics, because while I agree with your general notion, your tone and way of leading the argument reaks of "No it's actually this way because I'm better then you and my farts smell awesome. Wana sniff?"

    A lot of people on the right feel that way trying to talk to people on the left, I think it's one of the major sources on contention between the two groups.

    þ Crystal Palace, Orbitsville þ

    ---
    þ Posted via InnerRealmBBS þ
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Inner Realm BBS - Charlotte, NC - innerrealmbbs.us
  • From Al@VERT/TRMB to Vlk-451 on Monday, December 28, 2020 18:54:02
    Re: Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
    By: Vlk-451 to Al on Tue Dec 29 2020 01:19 am

    It's not semantic at all. There is a problem behind the protests and
    riots that follow, but that is not the left.

    Because you're the arbiter of what is and isn't "The Left"?

    I am not the arbiter of anything at all. I am just saying that this is not a left or right issue and neither is the solution whatever that might happen to be.


    Are we talking about the authoritarian left or the liberal left? Surely the people involved in the riots and protests over these non-descript problems surely share some leftist ideology.

    This is not a non descript problem. It would be easier to understand and solve without the <left this> or <right that> comments.

    To someone like me, it is semantics, because while I agree with your general notion, your tone and way of leading the argument reaks of "No it's actually this way because I'm better then you and my farts smell awesome. Wana sniff?"

    Just so you know my farts are not usually all that good, and sometimes downright nasty. I wouldn't suggest anyone go there.

    Ttyl :-),
    Al

    ... Black holes are where God divided by zero.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada
  • From Gamgee@VERT/PALANT to Vlk-451 on Monday, December 28, 2020 19:21:00
    Vlk-451 wrote to Gamgee <=-

    Al wrote to Arelor <=-

    If you are talking about left organizations sponsoring groups that riot and vandalize in order to bring unstability against society and the federal government, then I agree it sucks and that burning the streets is highly divisive behaviour.

    The left does not sponsor groups or rioting.

    Ummm. Social Justics courses, human resources, the ADL, other
    Provda outlets that churn out regressive and inflamed articles?

    Hello?

    Gamer?

    Hello? Gamer? Learn how to read/post, wouldja? The text above that
    you quoted was a conversation between "Al" and "Arelor", and I wrote
    none of that. Not sure why you replied to me. Please try harder.

    I was intending to reply to Al and Arelor, I used one of your
    posts to quote them, forgot to change the names away from you to
    one of them, simple and honest mistake from posting too quickly.

    Why would you use my post and then need to remember to change the
    names? You replied to what "Al" posted, so just reply to his message
    and there's no need to change names. Simple, huh?

    I'm sure you've made that mistake before at least once in your
    life, so in that instance I would hope you understand.

    Actually, no, I have never made that mistake, so there is no "that
    instance". Good try, though. Well, mediocre try, anyway.


    ... He does the work of 3 Men...Moe, Larry & Curly
    --- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
  • From Vlk-451@VERT/INREALM to Gamgee on Tuesday, December 29, 2020 03:36:25
    Re: Re: Supreme Court Rejects Pennsylvania Lawsuit
    By: Gamgee to Vlk-451 on Mon Dec 28 2020 07:21 pm

    Vlk-451 wrote to Gamgee <=-

    Al wrote to Arelor <=-

    If you are talking about left organizations sponsoring groups that riot and vandalize in order to bring unstability against society and the federal government, then I agree it sucks and that burning the streets is highly divisive behaviour.

    The left does not sponsor groups or rioting.

    Ummm. Social Justics courses, human resources, the ADL, other
    Provda outlets that churn out regressive and inflamed articles?

    Hello?

    Gamer?

    Hello? Gamer? Learn how to read/post, wouldja? The text above that
    you quoted was a conversation between "Al" and "Arelor", and I wrote
    none of that. Not sure why you replied to me. Please try harder.

    I was intending to reply to Al and Arelor, I used one of your
    posts to quote them, forgot to change the names away from you to
    one of them, simple and honest mistake from posting too quickly.

    Why would you use my post and then need to remember to change the
    names? You replied to what "Al" posted, so just reply to his message
    and there's no need to change names. Simple, huh?

    I'm sure you've made that mistake before at least once in your
    life, so in that instance I would hope you understand.

    Actually, no, I have never made that mistake, so there is no "that instance". Good try, though. Well, mediocre try, anyway.


    ... He does the work of 3 Men...Moe, Larry & Curly

    Well, I was thinking about kicking your ass for talking all that shit.

    It's like I said, I plan on squatting / going full hobo. By that time I might have over my life time been able to mooch enough to get myself a trailer and move out to that lawless garbage city in the desert of california with no laws. I'll get satalite internet and solar panels/alternative energy sources.

    Shit, by 2050, I'm sure energy technology will advance enough for me to squeeze by on trash and duck tape.

    þ Crystal Palace, Orbitsville þ

    ---
    þ Posted via InnerRealmBBS þ
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Inner Realm BBS - Charlotte, NC - innerrealmbbs.us