HusTler wrote to All <=-
So what's your view on Trump sending in the Federal Police to certain cities to take back America from the Anarchists? Should we let them continue to destroy government property? Or should law and order be upheld?
So what's your view on Trump sending in the Federal Police to certain citi to take back America from the Anarchists? Should we let them continue to destroy government property? Or should law and order be upheld?
HusTler
havens.synchro.net:23
And COMPANIES also support it? That is why they get away with it, because everyone, including people with power, believe the narrative they are fed by the rioters, or at least, believed it until recently.
MRO wrote to Dennisk <=-
Re: Federal Police and Trump
By: Dennisk to MRO on Tue Jul 28 2020 09:05 am
And COMPANIES also support it? That is why they get away with it, because everyone, including people with power, believe the narrative they are fed by the rioters, or at least, believed it until recently.
i dont believe many companies support this anarchy. they only make a display or statement when cancel culture comes knocking. ---
= Synchronet = ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
So what's your view on Trump sending in the Federal Police to certain cities
to take back America from the Anarchists? Should we let them continue to destro
y government property? Or should law and order be upheld?
So what's your view on Trump sending in the Federal Police to certain cities to take back America from the Anarchists? Should we let them continue to destroy government property? Or should law and order be upheld?
i think it's great. they're doing it in my city. these democrat mayors are nut
. they dont care how many lives are lost.
So what's your view on Trump sending in the Federal Police to certain cities to take back America from the Anarchists? Should we let them continue to destroy government property? Or should law and order be upheld?
Although I don't live in the USA, I'm surprised how far these riots have been allowed to go.
i live here and i'm surprised. it's crazy what people do when they
think they can get away with it. ---
And COMPANIES also support it? That is why they get away with it, because everyone, including people with power, believe the narrative they are fed by the rioters, or at least, believed it until recently.
The more and more people are talking about morals and going good, the more evil
and barbarous they become.
Dumas Walker wrote to DENNISK <=-been
So what's your view on Trump sending in the Federal Police to certain cities to take back America from the Anarchists? Should we let them continue to destroy government property? Or should law and order be upheld?
Although I don't live in the USA, I'm surprised how far these riots have
allowed to go.
They are attempting to bait the federal administration into a reaction
and the administration knows it. I believe they are worried that "non-rioting protesters," which are being used as cover for the violent ones, will be injured or killed.
I think there is a user on here that noted that he was at one of the earlier protests, noticed how "dark" the mood of those assembled was,
and was smart enough to leave. If it was me and I was dumb enough to
keep hanging around past the point where the violent ones are injuring
law enforcement, I have made a choice against my own safety. That is
on me.
Dumas Walker wrote to DENNISK <=-Small business for sure can't afford to go along, they don't have the surplus or slack in their operations to support such positions.
i live here and i'm surprised. it's crazy what people do when they think they can get away with it. ---
And COMPANIES also support it? That is why they get away with it, because everyone, including people with power, believe the narrative they are fed by the rioters, or at least, believed it until recently.
Not sure about larger companies, but the businesses in the affected
areas are starting to get tired of it all.
The more and more people are talking about morals and going good, the more evil
and barbarous they become.
Unless Trump wins in November, they will stop shortly after the
election.
Re: Federal Police and Trump
By: Dennisk to MRO on Tue Jul 28 2020 09:05 am
And COMPANIES also support it? That is why they get away with it, because everyone, including peo
with power, believe the narrative they are fed by the rioters, or at least, believed it until
recently.
i dont believe many companies support this anarchy. they only make a display or statement when cancel
culture comes knocking.
So what's your view on Trump sending in the Federal Police to certain cities to take back Ameri
from the Anarchists? Should we let them continue to destroy government property? Or should law
order be upheld?
i think it's great. they're doing it in my city. these democrat mayors are nut
. they dont care how many lives are lost.
They not only don't care, I am convinced that some of them (the mayor of Portland is an example) want
people to be killed so that they can implicate
the federal administration.
* SLMR 2.1a * "Bother", said Pooh, as he pulled the cat off his face.
Dumas Walker wrote to DENNISK <=-
So what's your view on Trump sending in the Federal Police to cert cities to take back America from the Anarchists? Should we let them continue to destroy government property? Or should law and order be upheld?
Although I don't live in the USA, I'm surprised how far these riots havebeen
allowed to go.
They are attempting to bait the federal administration into a reaction and the administration knows it. I believe they are worried that "non-rioting protesters," which are being used as cover for the violent ones, will be injured or killed.
I think there is a user on here that noted that he was at one of the earlier protests, noticed how "dark" the mood of those assembled was, and was smart enough to leave. If it was me and I was dumb enough to keep hanging around past the point where the violent ones are injuring law enforcement, I have made a choice against my own safety. That is on me.
Provoking a response is a standard Left wing tactic, which seems largely to fulfil the need to validate their position as an oppressed and abused demographic. Maybe there is some psychological need being fulfilled? Validation of ones position as the oppressed? A psychological release from realising ones position as the helpless?
... Dennis Katsonis
Re: Federal Police and Trump
By: Dumas Walker to MRO on Tue Jul 28 2020 11:13 am
So what's your view on Trump sending in the Federal Police to cert from the Anarchists? Should we let them continue to destroy govern order be upheld?
i think it's great. they're doing it in my city. these democrat mayors >. they dont care how many lives are lost.
They not only don't care, I am convinced that some of them (the mayor of people to be killed so that they can implicate
the federal administration.
* SLMR 2.1a * "Bother", said Pooh, as he pulled the cat off his face.
My outsider's opinion is that terroristic field agents are a lucky finding f want to wreck the federal government. They can let the terrorist break havoc blind eye, without being directly implicated themselves.
It reminds me of Basques who rented appartments to Basque terrorist knowing appartments.... they supported the revolutionary activities but they could d with them. "I know nothing officer, I am only the landowner."
--
gopher://gopher.operationalsecurity.es
Arelor wrote to MRO <=-becaus
Re: Federal Police and Trump
By: MRO to Dennisk on Mon Jul 27 2020 08:50 pm
Re: Federal Police and Trump
By: Dennisk to MRO on Tue Jul 28 2020 09:05 am
And COMPANIES also support it? That is why they get away with it,
e everyone, including peolea
with power, believe the narrative they are fed by the rioters, or at
st, believed it until
recently.
i dont believe many companies support this anarchy. they only make a display
or statement when cancel
culture comes knocking.
What I am seeing is a lot of defensive reactions from orgs, enterprisal
or otherwise.
Software projects switching to SJW terminology and SJW Codes of Conduct because they are afraid they will be somehow squashed if they don't.
Book Publishers adapting their cataloge because some themes are
forbidden and they are afraid of negative PR if they publish a story
with politically unacceptable characters.
I think these defensive manouvers just perpetuate the problem. They
just empower these communist cultural despots. Besides, it is
impossible to remain "pure" in their eyes. You may destroy your book cataloge in order to be SJW compliant just to discover you have a 51%
of male authors, bringing the wrath of the SJW's upon you anyway.
This is very frustrating because some of my stories are quite good but publishers won't ever buy them this year due to the political climate only.
MRO wrote to Dennisk <=-
i live here and i'm surprised. it's crazy what people do when they
think they can get away with it.
MRO wrote to Dennisk <=-
i dont believe many companies support this anarchy. they only make a display or statement when cancel culture comes knocking. ---
Dumas Walker wrote to HUSTLER <=-
If the reports are correct that there are unmarked vans going around
and rounding people up, I am concerned about that.
Provoking a response is a standard Left wing tactic, which seems largely to fulfil the need to validate their position as an oppressed and abused demographic. Maybe there is some psychological need being fulfilled? Validation of ones position as the oppressed? A psychological release from realising ones position as the helpless?
It reminds me of Basques who rented appartments to Basque terrorist knowing ful
y well who was using the
appartments.... they supported the revolutionary activities but they could decl
re they were not involved
with them. "I know nothing officer, I am only the landowner."
It's so one-sided it's scary. When Cliven Bundy's tax protests happed a few years ago, there was no outcry when the black helicopters showed up and the federal ninjas stopped cars and beat on their passengers until they laid on the ground. Anyone nearby was considered a "domestic terrorist" just for being there.
If the reports are correct that there are unmarked vans going around and rounding people up, I am concerned about that.
If I am a "non-rioting protester" I believe it is time for me to get out of that area. Otherwise, I am probably going to be used as cover by the violent offenders and I am going to get hurt or killed.
Dumas Walker wrote to DENNISK <=-
Provoking a response is a standard Left wing tactic, which seems largely to fulfil the need to validate their position as an oppressed and abused demographic. Maybe there is some psychological need being fulfilled? Validation of ones position as the oppressed? A psychological release from realising ones position as the helpless?
I am convinced that some of them have some sort of personality disorder for sure.
I am convinced that some of them have some sort of personality disorder for sure.
I think there is a lot of self-hatred and identification with people they believe are inferior.
Dumas Walker wrote to DENNISK <=-
I am convinced that some of them have some sort of personality disorder for sure.
I think there is a lot of self-hatred and identification with people they believe are inferior.
I think you have hit on something there... they do seem to treat those they think are oppressed as inferior.
Absolutely. This became clear to me, when on multiple occasions arguing peopl
of that bent, arguing against open borders, it dawned on me they thought that people that weren't White had no real chance of living a decent life unless they could be admitted to a White country. Which really is an admission of White Supremacism.
Dumas Walker wrote to DENNISK <=-peopl
Absolutely. This became clear to me, when on multiple occasions arguing
of that bent, arguing against open borders, it dawned on me they thoughtthat
people that weren't White had no real chance of living a decent life unless they could be admitted to a White country. Which really is an admission of White Supremacism.
While that may be true in some cases, I believe they would often have
an equal or better chance if they would band together in their own countries to change or topple their corrupt government and/or stop
voting in leaders who promise "free stuff" to begin with.
While that may be true in some cases, I believe they would often have
an equal or better chance if they would band together in their own countries to change or topple their corrupt government and/or stop voting in leaders who promise "free stuff" to begin with.
Easier said than done. A corrupt country is a reflection of the culture of that country. It isn't usually just the government which is corrupt, corrupt countries have corruption all the way down.
Dennisk wrote to Dumas Walker <=-
Easier said than done. A corrupt country is a reflection of the
culture of that country. It isn't usually just the government which is corrupt, corrupt countries have corruption all the way down.
Sysop: | MCMLXXIX |
---|---|
Location: | Prospect, CT |
Users: | 333 |
Nodes: | 10 (1 / 9) |
Uptime: | 145:23:53 |
Calls: | 576 |
Messages: | 237093 |